Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying
From: Angelo Campanella (a.campanella_at_att.net)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: Jonathan Smith: "Re: Defeating The Top 1%; Request For Criticism"
- Previous message: kevinbucknall_at_hotmail.com: "Free Course Notes - Introductory Economics"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:30:54 GMT
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
> Best of all, if feasible, is geothermal heat. We have a heat source
Look into the south African gold mine tunneling temperature problems.
There is so much geothermal heat they must contend with, that if it were
not for immense air-condioning air pumped down to them, they would
immediately perish.
> already in place radiating and conducting its energy away. Why not tap
> into it, if we can. We probably have enough energy there for a hundred
> million years, and we will be extinct long before that.
Find the facts, then project this into heat sources anywhere on earth.
Angelo Campanella
- Next message: Jonathan Smith: "Re: Defeating The Top 1%; Request For Criticism"
- Previous message: kevinbucknall_at_hotmail.com: "Free Course Notes - Introductory Economics"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]