Re: Alternative to Invention Patents
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 06/27/04
- Next message: jpathogan: "Re: US dollar: modern history"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 05:23:00 GMT
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:28:06 GMT, "Robert J. Kolker"
<robert_kolker@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Richard Tanzer wrote:
>> Ron, given your proposed system, anyone else could simply pay a few
>> thousand dollars and use my invention. Why would I be motivated to risk
>> a substantial amount of money without a chance for a large payoff?
>
>Because you love to invent and the effort is its own reward. Right? Yea.
>Sure.
I strongly suspect that _is_ right.
>Perhaps there are few who invent for the love of it.
Most inventors do.
>However, the
>inventions that -really- make a difference to the public generally
>require Big Bucks to develop into a commercially viable product.
Wrong.
>As you
>point out, no one is going to buy something that will be ripped off real
>quick.
But people buy public domain products all the time. You're just
wrong.
>Exclusivity is worth mega bucks to those who have the money to spend.
Well, yes, some people do go after economic rents like pigs hunting
truffles.
-- Roy L
- Next message: jpathogan: "Re: US dollar: modern history"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|