Re: Who are the richest men in world history?
From: sid myers (gloopencrotum_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: US dollar: modern history"
- Previous message: Bill Ryan: "Re: Inflation and Deflation"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Who are the richest men in world history?"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Who are the richest men in world history?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jun 2004 10:34:30 -0700
donhowe@aol.com wrote in message news:<op2rd0p7p041t02dov806sujoi624pmljk@4ax.com>...
> On 25 Jun 2004 03:24:07 -0700, craig_west72@hotmail.com (Craig West)
> wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know if there have been richer men (or women) in world
> >history other than the wealthy of the millenium (like Bill Gates)? I
> >mean relative to world GDP at any time in history, have there been
> >wealthier men hundreds of years ago?
> >
> >Like for instance, if the world GDP today is 6 trillion, then Bill
> >Gates share of world gdp would be 100 billion/6 trillion. This would
> >mean the Bill would own 1.6666% of the world's GDP. So if the world
> >GDP was 1 billion in 1800, then the man wealthier than Bill would have
> >had to have been worth more than 16.6666 million. In that context,
> >have there been wealthier men than Bill in world history???
> >
> >Would like to discuss this facinating topic with anyone who can share
> >some insight.
>
> Kid, you have not the slightest idea. - Bill Gates . . .?
>
> The Rothschilds and their gang control 'the trusts', which contain
> roughly ninety percent of the loot in the world tax-free, only about
> ten percent being in production and circulation. The funds behind
> 'The Fed' are just a bit of the ninety percent.
>
> When this is foisted on - 'invested in' - the world's nations via all
> our bribed 'presidents' and 'monarchs' and 'leaders' and such, less
> 'retentions' and less 'interest', this returns about 15% p.a., which,
> compound, doubles the basic amount each five years.
>
> This is why you work twelve months of the year instead of only three,
> why the planet is overheating, why you pay taxes or have to pay for
> anything and everything, why on a plentiful planet two thirds of the
> world are officially poor and half the world are hungry.
>
> But the joke is that the 'value' on which 'money' is based is really a
> fiction, and its manipulation is only a cheap bazaar trick which would
> be fraud if you did it. There is hardly anything about 'money' which
> does not have to be put between quotes.
>
> The Rothschilds are not rich. Spiritually, morally and mentally they
> are the poorest of the poor. They have only money and the
> determination to make the rest extinct, which is poverty indeed.
>
> By the way, don't refer to 'economists' about this, as the fiction
> they learn and teach has nothing to do with this ugly reality, and
> they haven't the slightest notion of it anyway.
work is done when a force moves a body or when there is a change of
energy. considering that all known life is solar powered carbon units,
what distinguishes us in wealth ought to be a product of our minds
affecting our environment. we all have a vision of how to manipulate
our environment to best suit ourselves. it takes some insight to come
to a negotiated settlement. governments would have us believe that
boom and bust in the economy is bad. perhaps this is bad, for
government. there is no shortage of outlets for energy expenditure.
the easiest way to create wealth is to identify a need and fulfill it.
this requires some knowledge which must be aquired over time. how
wealthy do you think would be the person who bestows immortality upon
mankind and provides the universe as its domain?
michaeloneill@nyc.rr.com (Michael O'Neill) wrote in message news:<4c749d1f.0406272207.1c3088cb@posting.google.com>...
> Boy, that's a fine bit of anti-Semitism you're putting out there! More
> of the grand international Jewish conspiracy, eh? I notice a certain
> absence of footnotes and bibliographical references. And you say it's
> not worth asking any actual economists about this because they've all
> been brainwashed, have they? Hmmmm ... Makes you think ... Kind of
> like "God" being "dog" spelled backwards. Let's go and cogitate on
> that one for a while.
well, lets ask the economists then.
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: US dollar: modern history"
- Previous message: Bill Ryan: "Re: Inflation and Deflation"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Who are the richest men in world history?"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Who are the richest men in world history?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|