Re: US dollar: modern history

From: The Trucker (mikcob_at_verizon.net)
Date: 07/13/04

  • Next message: sinister: "Re: The 'working poor' scam" 
    Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:38:21 -0700

    Johnny Marcos wrote:

    > The Trucker <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in
    > news:cc52qg1253c@news3.newsguy.com:
    >
    >> http://GreaterVoice.org/econ/glossary/handmaidens.php
    >
    > Adam and eve were the first in the garden of eden - the indians were the
    > first in america. The blacks the first in africa before the british
    > came.
    >
    > In the 1600's The europeans came over and saw these indians - and they
    > traded the indians tea and sugar for the use of the land - ownership -
    > and the indians laughed - LAND they said - you cant OWN land - it is a
    > gift from the gods - so they traded away land for tea and sugar thinking
    > they were fucking over the white man (notice how they were acting in
    > thier own best interests) and what a fool the white man was - so then
    > they tried to use the land - to hunt buffalo or cross over the land to
    > get to thier new campsite - and the white man pulled out a rifle and
    > said NO you can't do this anymore - you got our tea and sugar - now the
    > land is OURS - and then the indians understood what the white man meant
    > by OWNING land - denying them access to it. They began to stop trading
    > LAND for tea and sugar - but the white man wanted ALL thier land - so he
    > came and shot the indians that would not trade with him. The white man
    > was stronger, more numerous, had more guns and technology and education
    > - the indians lost that battle. Today you are getting old trucker -
    > your mind is not sharp - there are smarter people out here than you -
    > more aggresive people out here than you - I think you aren't productive
    > anymore - I don't care about your ownership of a damn thing, I am
    > younger and have a gun and am willing to use it to shoot you - so I am
    > coming to get your car and your land - now listen here old indian chief
    > - we can do this the hard way and I can chop off your head or we can do
    > this the peaceful way and you can just give it to me - lets not resort
    > to violence.

    I actually agree with a lot of this crap. I am not nearly as smart or
    as quick or as strong as I once was. But I am probably still much smarter,
    quicker, and stronger than you, since I was smarter, stronger, and quicker
    than about 90% of the rest of the people my age all along. And as far as
    your taking my assets without just compensation I will protest very
    loudly. But if you wish to make all land jointly owned by every voter
    of the sovereignty, however, I will participate. And, yes, I do own
    more land than the average dude.

    > Now that is what you are TRULY advocating trucker - so you being an
    > american, an as such being in the top 5% of the worlds population - you
    > as an american and an american population getting older and older need
    > to surrender our whole damn country to the young africans - they are
    > younger, stronger, and once they get armed and educated will be the
    > military you are.

    This part is total tripe. I have never seen myself as the military and
    I certainly have no objection to educating everyone. I do object to the
    owners of monopoly privilege making exorbitant gains agianst the rest of
    the population here in the USA by taking advantage of "free trade".
    These people are the recipients of most government services and they
    should be paying the full burden of the cost of the military and the
    police that make such ownership possible.

    > The chinese with thier 1.1 billion when they get the
    > weapons and technology we have - will crush us.

    I did not put myself into debt to the Chinese or to the well healed in
    this nation. That was our illustrious borrow and spend Republican
    government and thier handmaidens in the economics profession.

    > But you just like the
    > old indian chief do NOT want to leave your land - so how do we solve
    > this problem - history has proven the problem always gets solved by the
    > laws of nature - the strong dominate the weak - if you cant keep ahead
    > of the barbarians down in the valley by education or economy or
    > technology then they are going to overrun your ivory tower and there
    > will be much gnashing of teeth.

    Why? The weak are many and the strong are few. That is what
    representative democracy is all about. Republican order is rule by the
    minority. There are ways to handle this such that the minority does
    not rule and in which justice will prevail.

    > Do it the peaceful way trucker - give up all your worldly possessions
    > and land and chickens and tokens to the younger stronger peoples of the
    > world - quit being a selfish american living in the top 5% of the worlds
    > population - quit being like the indians and expecting just because you
    > were in America first you have rights that the new peoples do not.

    Sovereignty is what matters in the world today. The USA has no business
    invading Arab lands and telling those people how to conduct their lives
    and stealing the oil that belongs to the Arabs. The Mexicans and Chinese
    do not have the right to invade my country and overpopulate it. They
    may come in limited numbers that can be assimilated and educated. Not
    in droves that destroy Americasn culture and life style supplanting it
    with a culture that produces overpopulation and strife.

    > What you advocate - although possibly already done in a natural way by
    > the laws of nature - is for the old indian chief to commit suicide - for
    > you to commit suicide - go watch a movie called logan's run - we kill
    > off the people over 30 - that is what you are advocating - and to make
    > things OK the people should volunteer to get atomized so it is PEACEFUL.

    What a bunch of claptrap. You are obviously a moron (or a Republican).

    > People are NOT going to voluntarily committ suicide in this way

    Not so fast, sir. Many people decide to do this and they do it.

    > - when I
    > get old I don't want to surrender my fruit tree to young people that
    > will not feed me from it and niether do you for all you are preaching
    > from a macroscale - the individuals that make up the microscale will
    > NEVER end thier own lives to make that kind of system work.

    The young were protected, educated, and nurtured by what are now
    the old. At the same time those who are now old created real capital
    so as to dramatically improve productivity. The burden on the
    young should be offset by the real capital. Conservatism and a
    religious (moronic) aversion to anything other than survival of
    the stongest stands in the way of this progress. 

    -- 
http://GreaterVoice.org (a work in progress)
  • Next message: sinister: "Re: The 'working poor' scam"
    • Quantcast