Re: Population and longevity
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Les Cargill: "Re: Flat tax proposal"
- Previous message: John Gilmer: "Re: Population and longevity"
- In reply to: David James Polewka: "Re: Population and longevity"
- Next in thread: David James Polewka: "Re: Population and longevity"
- Reply: David James Polewka: "Re: Population and longevity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 00:10:15 +0000 (UTC)
"David James Polewka" <joseywales@outlaw.nospam> wrote:
> I thought Socialism was a good idea when I was 17.
Hmm, yet the record which documents that you are
lying still finds you an active participant of
talk.politics.libertarian as recently as 16 March
2004, suggesting rather strongly that your at least
eleven year worship of their unfeasible political
agenda still prevails. You must be a lot younger
than the senile dementia victim you play on Usenet:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4056b6d3.14573017%40news.east.earthlink.net&output=gplain
Oh, but that's right, that's alcohol damage! How
silly of me to forget why you are such an
incompetent fool.
> Read. Learn. Evolve. Need I say more?
First, you might try saying _less_, where the things
you are saying are such easily countered lies.
Second, yes, Read, Learn, Evolve is a fine game
plan. I suggest you start following it, focusing
particularly on the middle term, since the last
one is beyond your reach, and the first one is
beyond your ability, on the record again, to do
correctly.
xanthian.
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Les Cargill: "Re: Flat tax proposal"
- Previous message: John Gilmer: "Re: Population and longevity"
- In reply to: David James Polewka: "Re: Population and longevity"
- Next in thread: David James Polewka: "Re: Population and longevity"
- Reply: David James Polewka: "Re: Population and longevity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|