Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?
From: Bill M. (billm37_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/19/04
- Next message: Jim Blair: "Re: What happened to Japan?"
- Previous message: BELANGER: "Re: leni riefenstahl's underwater photos"
- In reply to: Andy F: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Next in thread: Johhny5: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Reply: Johhny5: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Reply: Ron Peterson: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jul 2004 07:48:49 -0700
aft627@aol.com (Andy F) wrote in message news:<20040718225632.19157.00001987@mb-m06.aol.com>...
>
> There are some figures on this website:
>
> http://www.walmartswaronworkers.com/multimedia/reports/WalMartBasicFactsSh
> eet10-03.pdf
>
Just finished reading the "report" from the site above. As one might
expect from the name of the site it is mostly WalMart bashing. In the
"report" they state that it would be possible to pay each worker a
$1.00 per hour more if they only tacked on a .5% price increase.
There is *no* indication how they came up with this number.
Co-incidently it was this very statement made my one of my friends
that got me interested in this issue. Funny how things have a way of
coming back to their orgin.
Thanks for any help.
Bill
- Next message: Jim Blair: "Re: What happened to Japan?"
- Previous message: BELANGER: "Re: leni riefenstahl's underwater photos"
- In reply to: Andy F: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Next in thread: Johhny5: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Reply: Johhny5: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Reply: Ron Peterson: "Re: Wal-Mart and Wages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|