Re: Population and longevity

From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 07/27/04 

Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 02:27:22 +0000 (UTC)

"David James Polewka" <joseywales@outlaw.nospam> wrote:

> Namecaller.

_This_ from the author of:

:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!
:- COMPULSIVE OVERPOSTER!!!

et cetera ad infinitum? You are giving
brain-damaged alcoholic hypocrites a
bad name, Polewka.

"Moron" isn't name-calling, it is purely
a level-headed assessment of your thinking ability.

For example:

> Uganda isn't the one occupying the Middle East, to
> keep oil flowing, so it can satisfy its thirst,
> which is so powerful because of bonehead
> government policies promoting sprawl, and goofball
> state suppression of the diseases that are meant
> to bring lives to a timely and merciful end, all
> of which _guarantees_ decades (or more) of global
> terrorism!

Ummm, we _used_ to be talking about the population
problem, of _the world_, moron. The US has such a
low birth rate it has negative population growth
before immigration is added to the mix, so the US is
the _last_ place that needs more help reducing it's
population. It is already more-or-less voluntarily
accepting population overflow from countries where
birth control needs to be more readily available,
such as predominently Catholic Mexico.

Uganda, which you so cavilierly dismiss, to the
contrary, is one of three countries expected to
contribute overwhelmingly to the continuing
population explosion _of the world_, moron. That is
where population control is needed. As indicated
in the URL from my previous article, your suggested
"population control mechanism" will do absolutely
no good in the countries, like Uganda, with high
birth rates.

By changing the subject, you have effectively
admitted you are WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. If you care to
claim otherwise, show, with numbers, how decreasing
the non-breeder old-aged part of the population, as you
propose for a population control mechanism, _of
Uganda_ is going to make any difference at all in
the population growth shown in the dynamic graph
pointed to by, one more time, _this_ URL:

http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/idbpyrs.pl?cty=UG&out=d&ymax=300

Otherwise, moron, shut up and go away, humiliated by
your inability to think a coherent stream of thought
after burning your brains out with alcohol.

xanthian. 

-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
Quantcast