Re: barter system
From: Jim Blair (jeb_at_wisc.edu)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Is there an (objective) definition of wealth?"
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: forecast"
- In reply to: kevincar: "Re: barter system"
- Next in thread: Ron Peterson: "Re: barter system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:05:27 -0500
"kevincar" <kevindotcar@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:60bf9d3f.0407281138.51ae9fdd@posting.google.com...
>
> I personally think your time would be better spent
> ignoring the bartering aspect because it's a pretty common
> understanding that people will seek out the most optimal trade
> (the perfect market v. imperfect market hypothesis)- If you
> truly came out with a way to bilaterally value bartered items,
> it would be revolutionary... to my knowledge everything
> historically has failed... From David Ricardo (c. 1776) to
> U.S. Government SIC codes.
>
> Later,
> K.C
Hi,
Does the internet and e-Bay change anything? Can't people now
barter for things from all over the world?
,,,,,,,
_______________ooo___(_O O_)___ooo_______________
(_)
jim blair (jeblair@facstaff.wisc.edu) Madison Wisconsin
USA. This message was brought to you using biodegradable
binary bits, and 100% recycled bandwidth. For a good time
call: http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/4834
- Next message: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Is there an (objective) definition of wealth?"
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: forecast"
- In reply to: kevincar: "Re: barter system"
- Next in thread: Ron Peterson: "Re: barter system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]