Re: New Ways to Loosen Addiction's Grip -- NYTimes

From: Caustic Soda (Metot_at_noneofyourbeeswax.org)
Date: 08/09/04 

Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 06:26:27 GMT

"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote in message
news:0d0e44d7649b0ed8eb77415b968d4709.48257@mygate.mailgate.org...

> What part of "she has a net worth near a million
> dollars" escaped your tiny, tiny brain, so that you
> think her incapacity could matter, fool?

I don't give a *** if she has fifty times Bill Gates'
$$$ in her purse. Does her senility prevent her
from making financial decisions on her own or
not? Who controls her money? Oh, and now,
you are waiting like a vulture for her to kick off
so you can squander her riches just like you
squandered your whole life, Kook. Is she brain
dead, by some chance? That's just the same
damned *** in a new wrapper.

>
> She certainly doesn't have to be able to work in a
> job to help me if she chooses. The help she has
> already given me means that I might well die a
> millionnaire, as her sole heir.
>
> Let's get back to the part where you lied to the
> crowd that my mother was dead, and got your ***
> handed to you once again, oh Mr. Pathological Liar
> Dan Sempsey.

Figure it out, Kook! Brain dead is just dead
with a mess of machines moving the body parts
like those of a puppet.

> What part of "all charges dismissed" makes you think
> that my interactions with the homeless-harassing
> Fresno Police Department have any impact on my job
> search, moron?

I reiterate, Kook. Some day you are going to meet
a competent, sober judge who is not suffering from
the psychiatric disorder known as liberalism. He
won't be an all forgiving, revolving door judge and
he definately won't play any of your weasely games.
Then your penny ante crime spree would be
interupted by a number of years rather than weeks.

Furthermore, despite the so-called "anti
discrimination" laws, employers often do refuse
to hire people with spotty work records who can
not account for themselves.

>Just what are your expectations, not that I
> have the least interest in meeting them.

My expectations are that you stop trying to be
Peter Pan and start acting your age. There is
no magic pastry tree that's going to feed you
in perpetuity and without condition.

>
> You invent some claim of mine that this is based on
> "the global economy" (I've never said any such
> thing, Mr. Pathological Liar Dan Sempsey), then go
> back to your unsupported claim that just about the
> time I started ragging on you for wasting 14 years
> of your life as a trash hauler, you "magically and
> miraculously" acquired a second job. That job, being
> one of proofreading, for which you are the least
> desirable possible candidate, one who can neither
> spell nor use correct grammar.

Precision, Kook is needed for contracts, not for
such informal gatherings as this group. There
was nothing "magical" or even "miraculous"
about my having acquired the second job. It was
years of saving my cash instead of wasting it. It
was poring through the paper work of getting
real estate deals transacted on my own. The
fact of my having done so for myself is what
qualified me to do it for others, not the trash
hauling in and of itself.

>
> Do you realize just how incredibly inconsistent your
> Usenet volume is with someone working two jobs, or
> how unlikely that posting activity makes your claim
> to _have_ a second job look to others?

Oh is that so? The patterns of my posting and
working are not entirely unbroken due to paid
personal holidays, vacation periods and abrupt
schedule changes brought by my employers.
But, there are patterns none the less. But, you
want to (again) slap your swollen chapped
hands over your eyes and try to wish them out
of existence just so that you can be right.

Go ahead, Kook, just try to use your phenominal
expertise in pattern recognition and statistical
analyisis to find out which shift I normally work
in the casino and how many hours per week I
put in at my second job.