Re: New Ways to Loosen Addiction's Grip -- NYTimes

From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 08/09/04 

Date: 9 Aug 2004 13:43:06 -0700

"Caustic Soda" <Metot@noneofyourbeeswax.org> wrote:

> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote:

>> What part of "she has a net worth near a million
>> dollars" escaped your tiny, tiny brain, so that
>> you think her incapacity could matter, fool?

> I don't give a *** if she has fifty times Bill
> Gates' $$$ in her purse.

Having been caught being stupid, yet again, you
descend to scatology for lack of useful words or
self-control. How typical of the mentally
impoverished.

> Does her senility prevent her from making
> financial decisions on her own or not?

It does; her previously made decisions are now
fixed and cannot be altered.

> Who controls her money?

A court-appointed "custodian of her finances", who
happens to be a CPA rather than someone more clever,
like a certified financial planner.

> Oh, and now, you are waiting like a vulture for
> her to kick off so you can squander her riches
> just like you squandered your whole life, Kook.

My frequent responses to Polewka on this very topic,
combined with your sentence above, point out yet
again, as if anyone needed relearning the lesson,
how thoroughly you mix up your desire to bully
people with your doofus inability to think your way
out of an open paper bag, producing hilariously
inane results.

> Is she brain dead, by some chance?

Brain dead is a technical term of art for someone
who is being kept alive although in a persistent
vegetative state. She is not in a persistent
vegetative state, but she has no more capability of
rational thought than a kitten, and probably less.

>That's just the same damned *** in a new wrapper.

That sentence fails to refer to anything
perceptible, making it a meaningless noise.

>> She certainly doesn't have to be able to work in a
>> job to help me if she chooses. The help she has
>> already given me means that I might well die a
>> millionnaire, as her sole heir.

>> Let's get back to the part where you lied to the
>> crowd that my mother was dead, and got your ***
>> handed to you once again, oh Mr. Pathological Liar
>> Dan Sempsey.

> Figure it out, Kook! Brain dead is just dead
> with a mess of machines moving the body parts
> like those of a puppet.

Once again you have pulled some "fact" from your
***, once again you are arguing as if it were true,
once again it bears no relation to reality, and once
again you are making yourself look like an idiot in
public. Do you really enjoy the results so much that
you can't break this habit of consistent lying?
Considering that you are making this mistake in
response to having this same mistake pointed out to
you, I suppose that is a rhetorical question: you
_love_ looking like a fool to everyone around you.

>> What part of "all charges dismissed" makes you think
>> that my interactions with the homeless-harassing
>> Fresno Police Department have any impact on my job
>> search, moron?

> I reiterate, Kook. Some day you are going to meet
> a competent, sober judge who is not suffering from
> the psychiatric disorder known as liberalism. He
> won't be an all forgiving, revolving door judge and
> he definately won't play any of your weasely games.
> Then your penny ante crime spree would be
> interupted by a number of years rather than weeks.

Let's see moron, I live in California, USA, state
with the highest proportion of the population in
jail of any state in the union, a state bought and
paid for by the prison workers' union, and you think
this state is full of _liberal_ criminal judges?

Your stupidity is showing.

You just cannot get your tiny mind around the
concept that if the judge dismisses all charges,
then what I was doing were _not_ crimes, so there is
no "petty crime spree", there are just a lot of
police who are homeless bashers and harassers, ***
clones of one Dan Sempsey.

> Furthermore, despite the so-called "anti
> discrimination" laws, employers often do refuse to
> hire people with spotty work records who can not
> account for themselves.

This has precisely what to do with your previous
claim that my "interactions with the police" are
somehow affecting my job search chances? You dance
around faster than the queen of the day at a gay
bar, Dan Sempsey.

>> Just what are your expectations, not that I
>> have the least interest in meeting them.

> My expectations are that you stop trying to be
> Peter Pan and start acting your age. There is
> no magic pastry tree that's going to feed you
> in perpetuity and without condition.

Funny, there's nothing "magic" about the American
habit of discarding edible food, so the dumpster
which fed me and would have fed five more like me,
is likely to be a ready source of nourishment for
decades to come, far longer than I can expect to
live.

>> You invent some claim of mine that this is based on
>> "the global economy" (I've never said any such
>> thing, Mr. Pathological Liar Dan Sempsey), then go
>> back to your unsupported claim that just about the
>> time I started ragging on you for wasting 14 years
>> of your life as a trash hauler, you "magically and
>> miraculously" acquired a second job. That job, being
>> one of proofreading, for which you are the least
>> desirable possible candidate, one who can neither
>> spell nor use correct grammar.

> Precision, Kook is needed for contracts, not for
> such informal gatherings as this group. There
> was nothing "magical" or even "miraculous"
> about my having acquired the second job. It was
> years of saving my cash instead of wasting it. It
> was poring through the paper work of getting
> real estate deals transacted on my own. The
> fact of my having done so for myself is what
> qualified me to do it for others, not the trash
> hauling in and of itself.

Right, your years of fantasizing about the
investments you would make if only you weren't stuck
in a scut-wages job makes you a prime choice to be a
legal document proofreader despite your execrable
spelling and grammar. You live in a fantasy world,
Dan Sempsey, and the version of it you post to
Usenet as if it were real is unravelling because you
are such a _really_, _really_ bad liar.

>> Do you realize just how incredibly inconsistent your
>> Usenet volume is with someone working two jobs, or
>> how unlikely that posting activity makes your claim
>> to _have_ a second job look to others?

> Oh is that so? The patterns of my posting and
> working are not entirely unbroken due to paid
> personal holidays, vacation periods and abrupt
> schedule changes brought by my employers. But,
> there are patterns none the less. But, you want to
> (again) slap your swollen chapped hands over your
> eyes and try to wish them out of existence just so
> that you can be right.

> Go ahead, Kook, just try to use your phenominal
> expertise in pattern recognition and statistical
> analyisis to find out which shift I normally work
> in the casino and how many hours per week I put in
> at my second job.

Why would I bother? If you had any such work
schedule, you wouldn't be able to post as much as
you do; you are thus lying about your work schedule,
end of story.

xanthian.

Anyway, it was my _daughter_ who won a supercomputer
shop management job at Argonne Labs based on an
undergraduate honors thesis on pattern recognition,
not me.

Quantcast