Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why
From: Bill Ryan (william_b_ryan_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Resurrection Order Appointment with Doherty J."
- Previous message: Bill Ryan: "Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why"
- In reply to: William F Hummel: "Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why"
- Next in thread: William F Hummel: "Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Aug 2004 19:16:46 -0700
William F Hummel <wfhummel@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<sevsh0lklgmatfuq235inh8vmmnkd3bb56@4ax.com>...
> On 14 Aug 2004 20:40:55 GMT, gchand4059@aol.com (Lantern) wrote:
>
> >wfhummel wrote:
> >
> >>Fed notes in circulation results in
> >>seigniorage for the Treasury equal to the total interest paid on the
> >>Treasury securities in the Fed's portfolio, less the Treasury's cost
> >>of producing the notes and the Fed's cost of distribution.>
> >
> >That doesn't sound like enough. The interest earned on securities in the Fed's
> >portfolio is only like maybe 4%. The seigniorage is like almost 95% (like
> >$19.94 on every $20 bill printed.)
> >
> Then you don't understand seigniorage on notes. Read my article
> again.
-------------------------------------------
Then, he definitely won't understand it.
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Resurrection Order Appointment with Doherty J."
- Previous message: Bill Ryan: "Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why"
- In reply to: William F Hummel: "Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why"
- Next in thread: William F Hummel: "Re: Seigniorage, Who, What, Why"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]