Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 08/21/04
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Previous message: William F Hummel: "Re: Seigniorage in Australia"
- In reply to: Les Cargill: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Next in thread: Les Cargill: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Reply: Les Cargill: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:24:32 GMT
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:52:08 GMT, Les Cargill
<lcargill@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Rue The Day wrote:
>
>> http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?control=1592&id=71
>>
>> They praise him endlessly for his writings on free trade and
>> protectionism, but then end the paper with a couple of sentences about
>> how he was wrong on the land issue "because Rothbard said so".
>> Classic.
>
>Isn't a certain skepticism of George's rather utopia
>"usfruct" in order, though?
George was fond of making utopian claims that LVT would be a panacea,
which it certainly would not, but that was pretty standard rhetorical
form at the time.
>I think we've all seen some
>incredulity here from us who have learned about it. I
>can't think of another thinker, other than certain
>Marxists, who don't consider absolute ownership of
>property to be a very core value. It is all but the
>very definition of why there is government.
Yeah. So, who should pay for government....?
-- Roy L
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Previous message: William F Hummel: "Re: Seigniorage in Australia"
- In reply to: Les Cargill: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Next in thread: Les Cargill: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Reply: Les Cargill: "Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|