Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?
From: kevincar (kevindotcar_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: nilkids_at_invalid.com.au: "Re: Re: Quest for the CFers"
- Previous message: john grove: "Re: Feeling the bite of inflation"
- Maybe in reply to: Sean Burke: "Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?"
- Next in thread: edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges: "Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?"
- Reply: edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges: "Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Sep 2004 17:45:58 -0700
greyhawk@myway.com (drifter) wrote in message news:<fabb7482.0408301414.302c7674@posting.google.com>...
> kevindotcar@yahoo.com (kevincar) wrote in message news:<60bf9d3f.0408250923.10552b14@posting.google.com>...
> > I woke up this morning to GMA, with Cheney plaintively crooning
> > about Gay rights... I Just had to weigh in with this thread.
>
> No... Cheney was repeating his stand, what he said before the 2000
> election.
> He _repectfully_ disagrees with Pres Bush. Cheney doesnt set this
> administations policy, Bush does. ... and that what Cheney said.
>
...And you really think if Bush bites it and Cheney is sworn
in, that policy will change? If so, methinks you're a sandwich
or two shy of a picnic in regards to realpolitik, my friend.
> Do you think people like Kerry - who doesnt have a simple answer for
> anything, and constantly waffles on anything he does say - is really
> better???
>
I would rather have *NO* answer, or a *CHANGED* answer, than
a *MORONIC* or *DEADLY* answer- but then, that's just me...
> How can conservatives be sleezier than liberals when liberals already
> occupy the bottom of the barrel... hehehe. just kidding (or am I?)
>
Most conservatives I've ever met were too inwardly fearful to make
a decision to change anything; much less themselves... If society
were left to Conservatives, we'd still be living in grass huts and
commuting by dug-out canoes.
The philosophy of Conservativism is to avoid and attack change
because it upsets the "status quo"- Ie, interest-groups that
*LIKE* the way things are because the barriers to entry for
economic success to less powerful individuals are already set
up; All-the-while pretending to embrace membership
to all, when in fact the GOP is a *very* caste-ridden clique.
The philosophy of Liberalism is much more to my liking; to
embrace change where change is needed...
The saddest fact of all is the largest political base of the
Conservative party is what needs the most help- The Southern
GOP belt, "NASCAR Republicans", home-schooled Christians,
and high school droputs. Yikes, what an evil *** Kerry is
to suggest providing health care to these and other such
demographic groups.
> So much for being mature or civil... politics seems to be a bunch of
> squabbling children...
Hey- that's just you talking my friend... You can follow Bush,
Kerry, Nader, Kent, Stalin, and Jerry Lewis all the way to Hell
and back- The only thing you need to question (and I don't really
see many Conservatives doing this) is *WHY*- Bush hasn't done
much other than lie cheat and kill; So Liberals are looking for
a change- wow, how childish.
K.C
- Next message: nilkids_at_invalid.com.au: "Re: Re: Quest for the CFers"
- Previous message: john grove: "Re: Feeling the bite of inflation"
- Maybe in reply to: Sean Burke: "Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?"
- Next in thread: edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges: "Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?"
- Reply: edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges: "Re: Are conservatives sleazier than liberals?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]