Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

From: Country Loon (fitlikemin_at_mearns.fairmers.co.uk)
Date: 09/30/04 

Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:47:32 +1200

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:414F4BA3.474828D3@hate.spam.net...

> There is not a single refereed literature citation in the whole of
> your manure pile. But then there couldn't be even a *single*
> supportive one in the whole of First World science, could there.

Classic case of Physicists being Twats - look at that arrogant reply to the
poor bugger who hasn't a clue? Here is what you say....

That's a nice try but to be taken seriously you really need to try and
publish your results in a refereed journal or at least a conference of some
sort.There is not point in spamming us with it - you need to publish it. If
however you feel you cannot publish it then you must examine closely the
reasons why. For instance is your theory correct or is the whole world going
to conspire against you? You decide.After it has been published then come
back and explain it all again to us.

Country Loon - the voice of wisdom.

Relevant Pages