TURMEL: Resurrection & "We'll Remember" SCC Appeals filed
From: John Turmel (bc726_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA)
Date: 10/09/04
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Cannabis Quebec #13 Fill the Hill article"
- Previous message: Gabrielle Rapagnetta: "Re: John Kerry Stalinist Campaign Slogan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Oct 2004 02:31:02 GMT
JCT: A real busy day first anniversary of Ontario Court of
Appeal Justices Simmons, Goudge and Doherty's Dirty Deed.
One year since Canadians were tricked into thinking that the
law had just been resurrected at the very moment they found
out about Terry Parker Day repeal. "Today the Court confirms
that the law's been dead for 2 years but we're bringing it
back to life. Sorry you missed the party." Instead of all
Canada's epileptics population having instant access to
their best anti-seizure medicine, they were tricked into
thinking it's still illegal and 1500 of them lost their
lives due to the court's bluff. Ha ha?
I showed up in Toronto at 10am and served the Attorney
General's office with both applications for leave to appeal
to the Supreme Court of Canada, one an inch thick and the
other an eighth.
Then I went up the street with the two Applications in one
hand and a 5 foot x 4 foot picket sign, "Turmel For Legal
Marijuana" and marched around Osgoode Hall waving the sign
in their windows.
Then off to Ottawa where I there with 20 minutes to spare.
Inside the Registrar's office, the lady didn't realize that
the pile of small booklets wasn't just an addition to the
pile of big booklets. I had to reassure her that they both
had their own 39740 and 40127 numbers. I bet they don't get
too many applications that small. Could it be a record?
I'd sent a fax announcing a press conference to most of the
media, including the usual French Quebecois stalwarts:
>>
Turmel's Two Supreme Court of Canada Marijuana Appeals
May 14 2003, John The Engineer Turmel was arrested at the
House of Commons on Parliament Hill with a life sentence
supply of 7 one-pound-bags of marijuana very loudly stating
that the statute had been repealed after July 31 2001 Terry
Parker Day.
Oct 7 2003, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed in Turmel
v. HMTQ #39740 that "the marijuana prohibition in s.4 of the
CDSA to be invalid" since Terry Parker Day but also ruled
that the Hitzig v. HMTQ case had fixed things so that
"prohibition is now no longer invalid, but is of full force
and effect." Lower courts are now enforcing the new law.
On Dec 8 2003, the Crown stayed 4000 s.4 possession charges
laid since Terry Parker Day but not after the Hitzig Court
had ruled "prohibition is now no longer invalid, but is of
full force and effect."
Applicant is asking the Supreme Court to Order the Attorney
General to do his duty to those innocent Canadians and
expunge the criminal records of those wrongly convicted
since the law had been repealed.
But I went up on the Hill with so much marijuana that they
had to charge me with possession of marijuana for the
purpose of trafficking under s.5(2), not s.4, so I wasn't
one of the lucky 4000 I managed get off. Why? Section 4 of
the CDSA says it is illegal to possess anything on Schedule
II of banned substances. Schedule II lists "marijuana." When
the marijuana prohibition in s.4 of the CDSA became invalid,
the only way re-print the legislation to reflect the repeal
of the prohibition without adding the words "except for
marijuana" in Section 4 had to be by the deletion of
"marijuana" from list.
So the Lederman appeal is challenging the court's Hitzig
resurrection of the prohibition on marijuana to keep it
repealed because Parliament Only Legislates, Courts Only
Abrogate. The Aitken appeal is challenging the government's
failure to re-print the legislation thus invalidating the
prohibition in all other sections, including my s.5 too. All
marijuana charges everywhere in Canada will have to be
adjourned, stayed, delayed, pending the resolution of these
two fundamental questions by the Supreme Court of Canada.
Nothing can move forward in the courts until the Supreme
Court has ruled on whether the court's repealed still stands
or whether the court resurrection stands; and whether the
failure to enact the words "except marijuana" in s.4 results
in its deletion from the list for all other sections too.
Oct 22 2003 Ottawa courtroom #13 for my trial for possession
for the purpose of trafficking 7 pounds of marijuana on
Parliament Hill.
Click on Supreme Court at
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/medpot.htm
Press conference Thurs Oct 7 2004 4:30pm Supreme Court
building in Ottawa, Wellington & Kent.
>>
JCT: Unfortunately, none showed up. Maybe the challenge to
the Hitzig Resurrection Opinion isn't really news? Maybe a
challenge to all charges for all sections maybe really isn't
news? Maybe the guy who got 4000 people off trying to get
the other 100,000 off isn't news? The noses for news must
know.
Anyway, everything got done and now the Crown's got their 30
days to file their Memorandum in response by Nov 6. I should
put it in a book since it'll never make the press.
Oct 19: Sheppard decision in Toronto
Oct 22: Parliament Hill bust trial in Ottawa
-- Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Cannabis Quebec #13 Fill the Hill article"
- Previous message: Gabrielle Rapagnetta: "Re: John Kerry Stalinist Campaign Slogan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
