Re: Side effects: the drug conspiracy
From: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore (fbonsignore_at_beethoven.com)
Date: 10/20/04
- Next message: Pepe le Pew: "Re: Letter to editor -- Flu shot promoters short-sighted"
- Previous message: BJ Kemp: "Re: Budget Deficits Lead to lower or higher GDP?"
- In reply to: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore: "Side effects: the drug conspiracy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Oct 2004 08:02:59 -0700
I started this thread because it was posed as a challenge. I am sure
this would be a better world if it is recognized that people have the
right to use drugs and assume the consequences if something happens,
the same way as happens with alcohol. And it is very easy, instead of
spending billions in a stupid war and destroying more lives tan are
saved, that money can be used to issue "cards" to get drugs from
authorized dealers or fromthe government itself. Lots of people would
stop being criminals, there would be no more side effects, the police
would be more effective, diversity would be recognized as a principle.
dangerous drugs would stop being used, tobacco would be less a
problem, the good effects of drugs would be acknowledged, research
would get better options, patents kept secret would benefit people,
there would be less violence, more thorough information would be
available, lives wouldn't be destroyed by destroying reputations and
spreading rumors, etc.
After all, if cocaine and marihuana are so dangerous, why not
ERRADICATE the fields? THAT can be done and it WOULDN'T be an
ecological catastrophe, there are enough species going extinct every
day that the extinction of dope and cocaine would not even be noticed.
So why be hypocrits?
- Next message: Pepe le Pew: "Re: Letter to editor -- Flu shot promoters short-sighted"
- Previous message: BJ Kemp: "Re: Budget Deficits Lead to lower or higher GDP?"
- In reply to: Fabrizio J. Bonsignore: "Side effects: the drug conspiracy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
