TURMEL: From Ed Pearson - True or False? False.

From: John Turmel (bc726_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA)
Date: 11/29/04


Date: 29 Nov 2004 07:05:51 GMT


>Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 (Eastern StandardTime)
>From: ed2411@cogeco.ca (ed pearson)
>Subject: Re: TURMEL: From Alan Young - True or False? False.
>To: MedPot-discuss@yahoogroups.com
 
EP: The Court of Appeal had already stated that if no
medical exception was enacted by Parliament that the
prohibition against possession of Marijuana would be without
force and effect on August 1 2001. did you doubt the parker
2000 order?

JCT: Health Canada says the MMAR worked comply with it.

EP: your unnecessary moves brought about the mess you and
young created together.

JCT: Unnecessary when everyone said it worked?

EP: do not place the blame for your stupidity on young thogh
he was as stupid actually to follow you as a civil matter,
he had no excuse to so proceed.

JCT: I wish I knew what Ed was talking about but he seems to
reside in his own dream world. "Why fight when they have no
right to do it?" isn't a good question when they do it.

EP: however he was trying to knock out the mmar. he was not
like you attempting to have some court declare what the
ontario court of appeal had already ordered re; august 1
2001.

JCT: I was trying to declare that the MMAR had failed to
save the CDSA. Can't think of any other way of proving it
that Health Canada and the press were misleading Canadians.

EP: why did you need confirmation of the order of the court of
appeal.

JCT: They were still busting people and I don't live in Ed's
dreamland.

EP: do not try to make it appear joh that you were attacking
the mmar, because that is a lie.

JCT: After all these years of following my criticisms of
Young attacking the MMAR when all we had to do was show it
didn't work, not that it was unconstitutional, to comply
with the Parker court's ruling and Ed now tells me not to
try to make it appear that I was attacking what I never
attacked. Besides, that's what Lederman said I was doing.
Where did Ed get the impression that that could possibly be
true?

EP: your only issue was that you wanted some court to
declare after august 1 2001 that cdsa 4 (1) was dead.

JCT: That the MMAR they were saying had saved the CDSA
didn't work if Parker wasn't protected. Yes. How else to
prove the CDSA was dead when they were telling Canada it had
been saved?

EP: somthing of which no one denied. except of course you,
with your stupid motion.

JCT: You'd rather I'd have done like you instead, done
nothing?

EP: john you are a real ass. you sought glory and have
damned everyone and now you blame any and all for your
falsehoods.

JCT: Har har har har.

EP: you have done all in all more to hurt this cause than
alan young and all of the crown attorneys together.

JCT: Har har har har.

EP: explain to your followers john why you needed to put the
motion you did before the court, seeking as you say to have
the court declare that august 1 2001 was terry parker day.

JCT: Because the cops were still busting people.

EP: hell everyone knew that john,

JCT: Evidently the cops and the most Crowns did not. The
Crowns guilty of mischief and genocide did though.

EP: the court of appeal had already said so in 2000 in the
parker case.

JCT: But Health Canada said the MMAR had complied with
Parker. How else but to rebut their claim?

EP: so why john, why the motion what was the purpose and
objective.

JCT: To prove what Pitt had said, that the MMAR had not
complied with Parker.

Are people starting to realize Ed's not all there yet?

--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm 
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics


Relevant Pages

  • TURMEL: Johnson Crowns serendipitous response
    ... Appendix.23 Krieger Crown Memorandum at Supreme Court....... ... JCT: Heres the funny part. ... Guess what the Crown brought into court in Elliot Lake to ... Har har har har. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • TURMEL: Hitzig Order mentions no resurrection
    ... JCT: There is now. ... Hitzig order, the court refuses to Order resurrection. ... Har har har har. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • TURMEL: Dakine Kamikaze Squadron in action Thursday
    ... there will be the eight of us in court again on ... JCT: I guess they never heard of applications for release. ... government spend resources to jail them. ... JCT: Har har har har. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • TURMEL: #3 Why no charge from Manitoba Kid
    ... I hope my court appearance goes as you say and I ... you are guilty if you accept the law still exists. ... No lawyer can save you from your brand new ... JCT: But it's not. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • TURMEL: Chuck & Noreen in BC court
    ... Chuck went to Court yesterday. ... Chuck was before the judge and apparently CROWN ... JCT: They all do that. ... (unknown to law) covering the same ...
    (sci.econ)