TURMEL: Instructions to Mike South's lawyer
From: John Turmel (bc726_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: MS: "Re: Nobel Prize In Economics Diminishes All Other Nobel Prizes"
- Previous message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Oshawa Kid loses with Pearson Deuces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Dec 2004 12:42:01 GMT
John C. Turmel, B. Eng.
8-37 Colborne E., Brantford, N3T 2G3
Tel/Fax: 519-753-0645, Email: turmel@ncf.ca
Dec 17 2004
BY: EMAIL
Leslie Maunder, B.A. LL.B.
Criminal Defence Lawyer
Pinkofskys Criminal trial & appeal lawyers
510-481 University Ave. Toronto,M5G 2E9
Tel/Fax: 416-598-1811/3384 Email: maunder@pinkofskys.com
Dear Ms. Maunder:
When you look at the Applicant's Inmate Notice of Appeal,
you will notice that the grounds Mr. South inscribed on the
form are very simple: "that Parliament has not re-enacted
the necessary S.7 cultivation and S.4 possession
prohibitions that sustain the improper purpose imputed in
S.5(2) since they were struck down."
The grounds for his application for release pending appeal
are: "My attorney (Renwick) did not inform me of the Krieger
decision at the Supreme Court of Canada on Dec. 23 2003
invalidating the prohibitions on marijuana in S.7 and S.4 of
the CDSA since Dec 4 2002. I was charged after that date. I
only learned of the Krieger decision after I had been
sentenced."
I'd bet you had not heard of the Krieger decision at the
Alberta Court of Appeal striking down the S.7 cultivation
prohibition and S.4 by implication! Nor at the Supreme
Court.
The striking down of S.7 was mentioned 3 times in the 24
lines of the appeal decision and yet it wasn't mentioned
once in the reports to Canadians, the judiciary and the bar.
I've done two posts on the reasons why no one knows. It
seems that the Calgary media, the Crown and the Defence
Attorney colluded to misrepresent the striking down of the
section for all Canadians as a personal victory for Krieger.
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/medpot/1544
Why no one knows about Krieger repealing S.7 Thu 12/9/2004
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/medpot/1548
How Crown, Media, Krieger hid S.7 repeal! Sat 12/11/2004
You did not hear of the Supreme Court of Canada affirmation
of the Alberta Court of Appeal's support of Justice Acton's
decision because the dismissal of the Crown's leave to
appeal was handed down on the same day as the far more
celebrated and covered Clay-Caine-Malmo-Levine recreational
use losses. Once again, the media did not inform the bar or
the judiciary and, not being called to the same standard as
engineers, the development remained unknown to the legal
profession.
So it's not the fault of the bar or the judiciary for not
knowing of the Alberta Court of Appeal's support of Justice
Acton's decision striking down S.7 because it did not make
the news. I also only found out about the decision of the
highest court of Alberta one year after the fact for the
same reason but, as The Engineer, I am called to a higher
standard and I had to dig it up.
I hope you noticed that neither Mr. DeFreitas nor Justice
Simmons dissed me and we go back along way. The media
covered up my involvement in the Big 7 appeals at the Court
of Appeal last year. I had 5 appeals heard. In their rush to
focus on the Hitzig loser, they forgot to mention Turmel
winning the Terry Parker Day declaration resulting in the
staying of 4000 pot charges. I have the two remaining
Applications at the Supreme Court of Canada and I'm still
after emptying the jails and the erasure of plus 200,000
criminal records registered since the law was repealed on
Aug. 1 2001. Minimum.
So you and your firm are tapped with helping Mike South when
he appears before the court on Monday. Think of me as the
General of Combat Engineering for the Resistance and Mike
South as one my insurgents. These are the instructions I
will have him give you.
1) Read the Notice of Application with the 3 pages of
argument presenting the Parker and Krieger Orders from
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/quscon.txt
2) Handle any questions after that.
If there's anything you can't handle that I can, Mike will
be signaled to tell the Court that he is resuming his own
representation. Then he asks for a moment to consult with
his coach which is inevitably granted.
I don't want to have to lay you off. These are not hard Aces
to play. http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/timeline.htm
contains all the relevant case law that's been hidden and
discovered. Familiarize yourself with it and you'll be the
first person to use the Krieger Supreme Court of Canada Ace
to win something.
Mike will also be handing in a Notice of Application for an
Order of mandamus that the Crown stay all marijuana charges
in Canada and that the Crown empty the jails rather than
make The Engineer liberate the prisoners one at a time.
But when Mike South gets out, the Court may wish to avoid
the rush of other prisoners by ordering the Crown to release
them all pending resolution of the Krieger challenge.
I have no doubt you find this hardly credible but keep in
mind that my winning 4000 stays gives me a better record
than any lawyer in Canada. And I won't quit until all of the
hundreds of thousands of innocent Canadians convicted under
the invalid statute have had their unjust convictions
overturned.
So be prepared and don't make me yank you from the game. You
have all the cards needed to win. The O.P.P. didn't call me
"Robin Hood" for nothing. Time for Robin to break my outlaw
band of "mari" men of out of jail.
-- Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
- Next message: MS: "Re: Nobel Prize In Economics Diminishes All Other Nobel Prizes"
- Previous message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Oshawa Kid loses with Pearson Deuces"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
