TURMEL: "Get out of Jail" AND "Get the Frankel Gang"
From: John Turmel (bc726_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA)
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: Some OldFart: "Re: Are You Concerned About the Future of White Societies?"
- Previous message: John Deere: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Dec 2004 16:10:46 GMT
JCT: Pierre Drouin reports that he and Real Martin couldn't
cope with the storm to get to Cochrane yesterday. Damn, bad
luck. Since the Crown had not served them with any response,
they must be pretending Her Majesty The Clerk can keep the
application off the docket. Or the Crown could have raised
the issue that they had only received 29 days notice. But we
know it's returnable any time after 30-days notice so they
could be returned next week.
After they had served the Crown 29 days ago and sent in
their applications, HMTC returned them with her legal
opinion that they'd have to wait until their trial in months
to have it heard. Guess the 30-day notice doesn't apply in
Cochrane. I reassured them that no Canadian needs live with
the cloud of a defective indictment hanving over their heads
for more than 30 days and no clerk, no matter how uppity,
can stop their application from being filed as returnable
after the 30 days notice has been fulfilled.
I told them to find the next date when the criminal motions
are heard and we'll send the Crown a Notice of Return of
Motion, and mail it all in once again. Pierre found that the
first available motions date was Jan 7! He'll be back and
there'll be no service problems this time.
If HMTC returns it once again, they'll just show up on the
slated date and hand it up to the judge with the demand to
be heard. Just like Doug and Laurie just showed up after
they'd been told their hearing of their application was
postponed by a JP and demanded it be heard by the real
judge. Know your rights and have grit.
Mike South was transfered to the Don Jail for his trip to
Osgoode Hall on Wednesday. Certainly before the paperwork I
sent him in jail had reached him. When I was out on release
pending my gaming house appeal, I had to give myself up the
night before at the Don Jail for processing through the
bowels of the court to my hearing. It's was a filthy, scary
place.
I always find it important to take time to muse on not only
what's really really good for us but what's really really
bad for them. One must look not only for the silver linings
in our jail-house clouds but also the nightmares in theirs.
John Thomas Cook
H: Is the Crown/justice system breaching their duties by
laying and proceeding with offences not known to law?
JCT: Darn right. And Mike South was dragged through the
slime of the system because these Crowns did just that.
H: All public servants are sworn to uphold the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms and have repeatedly failed to
do so.
JCT: There has to be a way to win more than just Mike's
release on Monday which presumes the defensive attitude of a
person who's thankful to be getting out.
If it was me, I'd be angry about being put in and
immediately strike at the persecutors, expose and establish
their crime from the very first moment. And the Frankel
Posse at the Ministry of Justice did it to him. And me. I
was busted on the Hill after Krieger which I didn't find out
until the Supreme Court buried it under Clay-Caine-Malmo-
Levine.
So how to optimize on Monday's hearing? We've got a chance
to get a piece of paper in front of a judge with power to
push the Crown around on Monday. Remember when the Crown
told Justice Moldaver: "you can't force Health Canada to
grant Parker and Paquette exemptions." He responded: "I'm
making it a condition if you want a hearing for your stay."
They can do that.
But this is out and out abuse of the court's process and the
judge can make it a condition that the Crown release all
inmates on marijuana charges pending their appeals if they
don't want the present minister cited for contempt by not
correcting the crimes of the Frankel gang.
It's such a major injustice going, 60,000 busts a year is
164 improper busts per day still going on. Every day across
Canada, this many people get dragged through the system
because the Frankel cabal hushed up the repeal of the law.
What do we say to a Magistrate with complete power over the
Attorney General to put a stop to this injustice?
What can we say to the Magistrate to make her prefer having
them all freed by the Attorney General after one hearing
rather than have The Engineer stuff all those inmate appeals
onto their dockets for an attrition in time of 5 or 6:1 per
inmate hour. Driver, Guard, Clerk, Crown Attorney, Judge,
Duty Counsel. Per inmate.
I'm going to let myself imagine I'm the one coming up in
chains from the cells below up into the courtroom. After
all, if I'm convicted of the House of Commons bust, I'll
probably have to make the Don Jail trek again. I can imagine
being permitted to have my manacles removed, or not. I
forget, it's in my unpublished early journals.
But I'd be steaming at the Frankel Posse who knew the law
was invalid and didn't tell anyone just because the CanWest
Presstitutes helped them hush it up. Do they think that the
media not reporting it means it didn't happen? Reality
is going to bite.
What would I want show the judge about why the injustice of
my charge is such that release is mandated?
1) Kreiger Memorandum where the court dismissed the appeal
against Acton striking down S.7.
2) Frankel's Supreme Court Memorandum admitting S.7 and S.4
were struck down and pleading for leave before anyone finds
out.
3) Supreme Court ruling in support of striking down S.7.
4) Calgary news reports distorting the striking down of the
prohibitions into a personal win for Krieger, out and out
lies so the Frankel Posse can keep playing at cops and
farmers.
Everybody is improperly in jail in Canada for marijuana
since Dec 04 2002 because the Frankel Posse knew the truth
and helped keep it hushed up. I'd ask the judge to cite the
trio of Toronto Sumbitches in the Attorney General's office
with contempt of the Alberta Court of Appeal and Supreme
Court of Canada for not obeying the striking down of the law
and knowing it.
I want them jailed for dragging me and Mike through the
system knowing the prohibitions in S.4 and S.7 had been
struck down. I want the Ministry of Justice Attorneys who
knew and their Attorney General cited for contempt of the
Court's Order as long as they continue in any prosecutions
and continue to hold any prisoners.
Of course, the judge could hold a hearing (before Christmas,
how about Tuesday? the judge is there all week) on why the
Attorney General should not be cited for contempt of court
for continuing to prosecute Canadians knowing the sections
had been struck down even if the judiciary and bar did not.
Release them and we'll settle for just the Frankel gang.
Why couldn't S. David Frankel be cited for contempt of court
as a first stage in seeing the Frankel gang behind bars.
Imagine being responsible for knowingly convicting 100,000
Canadians under an invalid prohibition? Pretty spectacular
crimes, aren't they? What, did they think this was a game
with Turmel talking genocide again?
So, coming up from the dungeon, can the inmate hand in a
motion that he not only be released but that the Crown show
why they should not be cited for what looks to be a really
serious abuse of the process of the court?
They, and the media, fooled the whole judiciary into
convicting 100,000 people while they knew the prohibitions
were no longer valid. Can you imagine the destruction
they've done to so many people's lives and families? The
genocide that this shyster cabal has committed is an
incredible crime, actually.
Har har har har. Going on offence is so therapeutic. Mike
hands up his new motion for relief other than release
pending his appeal which specifically forces the Frankel
Gang to prove to the judge that the law is alive after
Krieger killed it. Can you think of anything that can hurt
the Attorney General's Frankel gang more than moving for
abuse of process and contempt of court?
These crooked shysters have to be made into the whole story
at Monday's hearing. Once the request goes in that they be
cited for contempt, there may be no more ducking our most
powerful move. Sure, admitting Krieger wins is nice but
admitting they hid it on purpose is better. Look at what
these Crown Attorney's have done. Regardless of whether
their political puppet of a minister knew or not.
Imagine the press release I'll be faxing out to all the
Toronto media. Imagine other activists being enlisted to
inform their local and national media outlets of why Mike
South is asking to have the Crown Attorney S. David Frankel
cited for contempt?
It's the start of the trek to jail for the other team for a
change? Can the threat of a contempt citation force the
Attorney General to free all the marijuana prisoners instead
of forcing me to free them all one at a time? Before
Christmas?
Can the abuse be so obvious that the judge threatens the
citation if the cells aren't opened up? Can all the innocent
victims of the Frankel Gang abuse of process be freed before
Christmas? Why not try? Why not ask? Mike South is our
chance.
Remember, this judge didn't know about what Frankel knew
because the media did not tell her and Frankel didn't
either. Can I convince the court it's better to blame the
Frankel Gang and open the jails to save us all the time I'll
spend stuffing their courts with inmate appeals at a 6:1
time attrition rate? I sure hope so.
All Mike has to do is sign the Notice of Motion I'll have
prepared for him asking to cite Attorney General for
contempt of the Alberta Court for ignoring the repeal of S.7
and S.4 of the CDSA and hand it to the clerk right away.
Hope this new nightmare ruins the Frankel Gang's Christmas.
So Monday's strategy changes from just "Getting out of Jail"
to "Getting the Frankel Gang."
-- Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
- Next message: Some OldFart: "Re: Are You Concerned About the Future of White Societies?"
- Previous message: John Deere: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|