Re: Democracy is itself a good
jmhall_at_apex.home.net
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Dec 2004 22:43:12 -0500
"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> writes:
> Ron Allen wrote:
>
> > Unless you have some qualified author you can
> > quote concerning this matter, I will simply take
> > Paxton's statement as being a reliable account of
> > the facts.
>
> I never said he got a majority. I said that he was placed in office by
> a democratic election. He probably got a plurality. That is o.k. Bill
> Clinton never got more than a pluraility in both his terms.
When was the last time any democratically elected representative
got more than a plurality?
jmh
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]