TURMEL: Abolitionists decry Frankel Gang to Chief Justice
From: John Turmel (bc726_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA)
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: bittoz_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Sustainable Development Conference Linked to Livelihoods, India, Jan 2005"
- Previous message: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Dec 2004 05:14:11 GMT
McLachlin
JCT: It's the only way left to influence the motion to stay
execution of the Hitzig decision I triggered on Dec 24 2004.
The Chief Justice can grant the request, expedite a hearing,
wait 10 days for the Crown reply, then do something. All the
while, we have to be getting people to send in their
opinion. Where are all these "activists" who urge us to vote
in polls all over the Internet? Here's a opinion poll that
really counts and they're going to miss it because they
don't like the organizer who put the focus on 1 stake over
heart. Here are the first people to record their opinion on
whether the Hitzig resurrection should be stayed and
prohibition turned off and citing the Crown for abuse and
contempt:
>Orchidman
>Re: Mike South Uses Get Out Of Jail Kit & Gets Out
>Date: #1012239 - Sun Dec 26 2004 07:13 AM
O: Here is a letter I sent today.
JCT: Instant reaction. Thanks much.
O: Dear Chief Justice McLachlin,
I feel it is my duty as a Canadian to speak up when I see a
grave injustice in my country. In 1982 this country changed
from a parliamentary democracy to a constitutional
democracy. The constitution is now supreme. It is the duty
of the court to ensure that the constitution remain supreme.
If police violate anti-privacy laws they must be stopped. If
crown prosecutors prosecute in violation of the constitution
they must be stopped. If governments try to uphold laws that
are unconstitutional they must be stopped. The constitution
is now King.
When the court sees repeated violation of the constitution
in cases such as the abuse of process in the marijuana laws
they have a duty to put there foot down hard.
JCT: I sure hope so. If not to rein in an errant Sheriff,
who? The King of Parliament? The Court? Citing for contempt
has to be a useful tool here. Can anyone not say that
continued prosecutions under a statute they admitted was
invalid is an abuse of process and should be cited for
contempt for what they did and if they don't stop?
O: No law is better than the confusing state of the
marijuana laws today.
JCT: And no law is what it really happens to be.
O: As a citizen of this great country I am entitled to a law
that is clear and free of confusion and every person must be
treated equally. Many courts have ruled the marijuana laws
are too confusing and threw out the cases.
JCT: Some threw them out because the marijuana laws were
dead too.
O: Now the court has an opportunity to put things straight.
The motion coming before you from Mr John Turmel to cite the
Crown Prosecutors for contempt and abuse of process is your
chance to put your foot down hard.
JCT: Oh, is it ever. End the nightmare for the whole country
all at once. Make room in the jails to give serious
criminals some space. I can move on to bigger things at the
UN next. The U.N. marijuana laws are killing the Third World
too and The Engineer's job ain't over until everyone's got
access to the best herbal medication God ever gave us.
O: I have read every word of his motions and I think he is
absolutely correct. There is no marijuana law as we speak
and the police are still arresting people.
JCT: I'd bet they're going to have correct over 200,000
invalid convictions under the invalid statutes.
O: When the law was dead for the summer of legalization our
society did not fall apart. If you stay the Hitzig ruling
like John Turmel is asking our society will not fall apart.
If you uphold the constitution our society will not fall
apart.
JCT: Great point. If there was any use to the 26 months of
liberation from Terry Parker Day Aug 01 2001 to Hitzig-
Myrden Day Oct 07 2003 that's call the "summer" of
legalisation, it's that society did not break down. Thanks
much for bringing that to her attention.
O: And if you over-ride my rights with the cop-out clause of
"compelling public interest" it better be compelling.
JCT: And what they found compelling enough to beat
recreational use at 6:3 judges will certainly not be
compelling enough to beat medical necessity and medical
prevention uses.
O: I really do believe in the harm principal which states
that if I do no harm to others then I should be kept
harmless. How could the court over-ride that for the sake of
marijuana.
JCT: The Court has only ruled it's compelling enough to beat
the Malmo-Levine recreational use claim. The court has not
yet ruled on whether the need to protect society is
compelling enough to beat the Parker medical and Turmel
preventative medical claims. Can you not see how the Turmel
claim to increase protection for Epilepsy, Dystonia, MS,
Fibromialgia, and so many other diseases is much stronger
than the Malmo-Levine claim to increase his recreational
fun?
O: Even the most devious pedophile must be guaranteed the
rights of the constitution and his rights should not be
over-ridden except in the most compelling cases. To over-
ride my rights for the sake of a marijuana cigarette is
ludicrous.
JCT: I'm an adult with a Grade 17 in science and many more
years of post-graduate research and I say what I choose to
medicate myself with shall be my choice to the ends of my
forces.
O: According to the Leger and Leger poll a couple of years
ago 1 million people in Canada use marijuana as medicine but
the government has about 500 licenses for exemptions. With
the recent withdrawl of all major selling pain killers from
the pharma-monopolists I believe there will soon be a lot
more people using the safest pain killer, marijuana.
JCT: And Judge Lederman called that a success. 9 epileptics
out of 400,000 and this Gilligan of the Bench ruled that The
Taj Professor's math was "weak." Not wrong, weak. Only a
trained lawyer could think something right can be "weak."
But 9 epileptics protected out of the whole 400,000 Canadian
epileptic population, less than 1 in 40,000 and Justice
Lederman called that workable enough to pass constitutional
muster. The other 39,999 who don't qualify will have to do
without resulting in 4 dead epileptics a day who knew they
were epileptics and should have possessed a joint to stave
off their seizure.
And Justices Doherty, Goudge and Simmons agreed! Repeat:
Justices Doherty, Goudge and Simmons agreed that 9 out of
400,000 epileptics was successful enough to call the MMAR a
reasonable response! Only failure to provide supply at the
pharmacy was the problem and Alan Young's Hitzig case fixed
that up just fine.
O: The whole MMAR is an abuse of my rights. According to the
Parker ruling a patient in Canada has the right to the
treatment of their choice. What happened to the rights of
the 1 million Canadians. What was the compelling interest to
deprive them of their rights.
JCT: As Justices Doherty, Goudge and Simmons pointed out,
when the million sick-enough Canadians are dragged before
their tribunals, they'll be let off. Right. Justices Doherty
Goudge and Simmons said the cops bust everyone and those who
are sick get off. If they survive confiscation of their best
medicine. No kidding.
O: Everyone knows that the Hitzig ruling is a farce. The
court doesn't have the authority to re-write the law once it
has been declared unconstitutional. I think John Turmel's
request to stay the Hitzig ruling is correct.
JCT: They can reply, if it's dead, then there's no reason to
stay Hitzig. We have to answer "until it's admitted dead,
while they're still busting, there is reason to stay Hitzig.
O: This is the most confusing part because the resurrection
of a dead law is unconstitutional. Once it has been declared
unconstitutional it is of no force and effect. Period.
Immediately. Read the constitution.
JCT: Has the Chief Justice read it? Orchidman has.
O: In my opinion it has been unconstitutional since 1982 and
all charges since 1982 should be reversed.
JCT: I agree. It's one of the three alternatives I asked
for. All the way back to Mama Turmel's birthday 1982. April
17 1982. Just like the admission should have happened on
April 17 2002 at the Chapnik hearing before Crown Lara
Speirs got Parker stabbed in the back by a friend.
O: The court does not have the power to fix it up. I believe
it is your duty to stay the Hitzig ruling and cite the crown
for contempt.
JCT: I sure hope it's her duty.
O: Please give Mr Turmel's work the consideration it
deserves. Study it carefully please before you rule. His
arguments are irrefutable.
JCT: Sure seems that way. And the Crown's continual back-
pedalling and stalling have to point that way too. It's just
the magnitude of the abuse that's so startling as the stun
the mind. We understand.
O: If you stay the Hitzig ruling it basically means we have
no marijuana law again. That's okay because our society will
not fall apart and the law will once again be clear cut for
all to understand. No law. Constitution is King.
Respectfully, Orchidman Toronto
JCT: And yet, most of the press spokespeople for the Crown
keep saying that "no law" is muddy, confusing, hard to get a
handle on. Maybe they just can't cope with the job.
O: p.s
It is also the job of the courts to try and build a case law
that reflects the views of society. A recent poll that asked
what should happen to people found in possession of small
amounts of marijuana got a result of 55% in Canada and 68%
in Quebec saying they should be left alone. So when I come
before you your honour for possession of marijuana it is
your job to leave me alone in order to reflect the views of
society. Nice eh?
JCT: Thanks. Perfect gentle but righteous indignation. I'd
be asking if she'd consider grabbing Frankel's passport
before he tries to get out of town.
Doug and Laurie get on the record:
>Buds_4_Life Post #83
>Dec 27 2004, 02:45 PM
>http://www.commongroundcommonsense.com
D&L: We need everyone to write to the Supreme court of
Canada whether you've been charged or not, & tell them to
stop the lies. Here's a snip from John's explanation & our
letter to the courts. D & L
JCT: "At least she'll get an idea of the kind of sad cases
that will be pushed through her court if she doesn't do
something now.
There aren't too many times for an ordinary Canadian to have
a big influence in changing the laws. This is one of them.
Now's the time to fax and email your letters demanding
justice from the Chief Justice and her court.
Just like Frankel's the lynch-pin that brings the whole
prohibitionist establishment crashing down, McLachlin is the
lynch-pin that can bring the whole 9 Big Bricks down on
Frankel's head.
Now's the time to send an email to your whole address book
urging them to strike while the iron is hot. And it's red-
hot now. It's hotter than it's ever been before. Strike the
match under Frankel's ass. Sumbitch David Frankel's coming
down."
Executive Assistant to the Chief Justice,
Wendy Shoenherr-Geoffroy
Tel: (613) 992-6940 Fax: (613) 952-3092
Email: eacj-aejc@scc-csc.gc-ca
--- Wendy Shoenherr-Geoffroy Executive Assistant to the Chief Justice, JCT: Actually, make sure to mention it's for the Chief Justice, though I'd bet Wendy knows. D&L: Dear Madame, We're writing to you about a situation that is of national importance, unfolding across Canada right now. We had our door broke down by the police with guns drawn, under the guise of a legal warrant & have been charged with possession & possession for the purpose for a mere 20 grams of marijuana. Our daughter was home that horrifying night & was dragged in & charged along with us. We're just very thankful that the youngest was at a friends house at the time or her life would have been ruined also. Now let to get to our point. There are many sad cases like ours in the courts across Canada right now. Thankfully we have a growing network of people that know the truth & are challenging the validity of the law as well as the negligence on the part of the crown attorney's office as per John Turmel's motions. In crown Frankel's memorandum of Krieger, he admits the law would fall if not given leave to appeal & that leave was denied; which means the law died & the Krieger order stands. Frankel had an obligation to stop all busts & stay charges under the fallen C.D.S.A. until Parliament could legislate a new constitutional law. JCT: That's the point to keep hammering home. If not Frankel, the Crown who lost the case and has to explain it to Minister Anne McLellan who then decides whether to announce the invalidity of the statutes or whether she takes advantage of the media misrepresentation to hide the truth until she's shifted out of the Ministry and no longer responsible. The new guy is, and he wasn't there and won't know anything. D&L: People are still being charged & shuffled through the system as if the Supreme court of Canada has no power, only opinions. THIS MUST STOP NOW!!!! JCT: Righteous indignation for being embarrassed at being dragged through the system for an invalid statute she herself knocked down. Sad we have to explain Krieger to her, it was her case. D&L: Every person in Canada that has been charged under the unconstitutional C.D.S.A. since Terry Parker Day August 1, 2001 should have their records wiped clean. JCT: Give me an hour with the Government computer programmers and I'll explain the code they have to write to effect the desired output. I.e., if they can't figure out how to do it, The Engineer can. D&L: We're informing people of how their rights are being stripped away from them & it won't be long before the courts will be overloaded with motions to quash. JCT: Motions appeals, applications for leave to appeal, constitutional challenges, jury trials, release motions, appeals and second applications for leave to appeal, real guerrilla law warfare. D&L: The following are the steps we're all willing to take if needed to show the country the truth. We have already been throughout the lower court & are now moving up to Superior court, with many others following behind us. 1) Motion to Quash charges; done 2) Motion to Prohibit which stays proceedings below; this is where we are 3) Appeal to the Court of appeal; next 4) Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court; if needed we'll be there JCT: I have no doubt the Nielsens will reach the top before they have to start at the bottom again with those who did not. D&L: 5) Motion to stay for constitutional medical need like Parker & Krieger; this is where we bring into play our legitimate NEED for marijuana as per category 2 of the unconstitutional MMAR. JCT: Surprise, they qualify for exemptions except doctors won't sign and the Pitt decision says that when the doctors don't sign, the constitutionally acceptable medical exemption is absent and the prohibition is absent with it too! D&L: 6) Only then do you have a trial 7) Appeal to the Court of appeal 8) Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court As we said before there are MANY people like us that have a legitimate need for the healing herb, but we won't use that in court until there is no other option for us. JCT: Imagine 8 steps to convict everyone they bust. D&L: What crime did we commit in our own living room? Smoking, buying & selling MJ is done between two informed consenting people, what crime is there with no victim? MJ is helpful, not harmful, at least not until you add the police element to the equation. You see if a substance is legal, there's no need for it on the black market, therefore reducing any related crimes. We urge you to take notice of the injustice that has been happening & make right the wrong that continues to hurt innocent people across Canada. Doug & Laurie Nielsen JCT: Make right the wrong. What a way to end a plea. I'd love to hear the Frankel gangs responses. Of course, if she calls them on the carpet, your points may make a whole lot of difference. Frankly, I'm amazed that there seem to be so few people out there willing to ask the Chief Justice to cite the Crown for prosecuting under a dead law. Count all the people out there pontificating that the law is dead and then wonder how they can miss the chance to pontificate to someone who finally matters. I've put the stake over the vampire's heart but I might not have to weight to push it through. But you sure have to admit that the vampire knows there's a stake over its heart and I'd bet the Frankel gang may already be packing their bags and getting their travel papers ready for the big escape. Come on, admit it, staying the Hitzig decision destroys their whole resurrection scenario. Applicant for leave to appeal may request the Hitzig decision be stayed, I'm requesting. At the same time is the abuse of the her own court. If you agree the Hitzig resurrection should be stayed and the Ministry of Justice should be thumped, how can you sit quiet with 1 day left to let someone with the power to save us know how much we'd appreciate her saving us. I think I'll have to split activists into two groups from here on, those who struck when it counted and those who did not. I know, this is such a spectacular positioning of the stake over the heart that not even their deepest moles can support it. It's our way of exposing those deepest moles. Or densest morons. Abolitionists of cannabis prohibition, this is your last judgment day. If you don't get your say in to the person with the power to do the coup de grace on the system that's hurting you, I won't be able to call you an Abolitionist. You've got 32 hours to help make a difference. Getting your friends to make a difference is part of it too. -- Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
- Next message: bittoz_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Sustainable Development Conference Linked to Livelihoods, India, Jan 2005"
- Previous message: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
