Re: Democracy is itself a good
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Previous message: Mirlitone: "increasing return to scale and perfect competition"
- In reply to: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Next in thread: Tron: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Reply: Tron: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Reply: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:22:42 GMT
jmhall@apex.home.net wrote:
> Of course we might also implement election rules that
> require a certain percentage of eligable voters for
> election and lacking that a moratorium on new legilation
> or regulation until either the next election cycle or
> some special election called for and participation
> known.
And just who would command the armed forces until the next election cycle?
Bob Kolker
- Next message: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Previous message: Mirlitone: "increasing return to scale and perfect competition"
- In reply to: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Next in thread: Tron: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Reply: Tron: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Reply: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Democracy is itself a good"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
