Re: Income from a tax on land.
jmhall_at_apex.home.net
Date: 12/29/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Previous message: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- In reply to: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Dec 2004 17:28:08 -0500
royls@telus.net writes:
> On 27 Dec 2004 23:14:19 -0500, jmhall@apex.home.net wrote:
>
> >Any economic rent is "unearned" in the sense that it's
> >more than is required to induce some resourcing into a
> >particular production activity. That holds for captial
> >and labor as well as land.
>
> Such definitions of rent are confusing, and IMO outright erroneous.
Stating that rents are unearned is not defining rent
merely noting one of it's characteristics. I don't claim
that all that is unearned is a rent.
jmh
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Previous message: jmhall_at_apex.home.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- In reply to: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|