Re: Income from a tax on land.
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Previous message: The Trucker: "Re: Bill Gates and Tsunamis"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:26:32 GMT
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 11:25:26 GMT, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote:
>royls@telus.net wrote:
>
>> Oh, no we ain't. Selection pressures have become orders of magnitude
>> more complex since the last Ice Age ended, but the chance element has
>> declined commensurately. We've probably evolved more in the last 15K
>> years than we did in the previous 50K.
>
>All evidence indicates that humans have not changed physically in over
>50K years.
That is false. Even American aboriginals are physically
distinguishable, in their gross anatomy, from the North Asian
populations they separated from less than 15K years ago. On the
molecular level, there is little doubt that e.g., genetic resistance
to a number of contagious diseases has increased markedly in just a
few thousand years.
>There is nothing to indicate Darwinian evolution is taking
>place.
ROTFL!! Just _weeks_ ago, we learned that a dwarf pre-modern hominid
species was still inhabiting an island in Indonesia less than _20K_
years ago! Evolution sure happened to _them_, all right...
As always when you presume to dispute with me, Bob, you are just flat,
outright wrong as a matter of objective fact.
>However, there is the rapid form of social adaptation in which
>people change their habits and ideas, rather than their genome. You
>apparently do not understand variation and natural selection.
<yawn> Back atcha, pal. What happens to the ones who are genetically
unable to change their habits and ideas to fit a new social norm?
>There has
>been NO essential change to the human genome as far back as anyone can
>reckon.
?? What is an "essential" change? Speciation? Who said evolution
only happens when a new species arises? And even if you think the
demise of a species is evolution, it clearly happened not that long
ago, in Indonesia.
>In addition one of the promoters of evolution is genetic isolation.
That is more a promoter of _speciation_. Not the same thing at all.
>Google <Galapagos Darwin Finches>. The human race is a very non-isolated
>bunch of mutts. We are six billion strang with a maximum separation of 6
>or 7.
Evolution is often rapid when isolated populations are brought into
contact. The selection pressure exerted by contagious diseases
brought to the New World from the Old just a few _centuries_ ago is
just one obvious example. Selection for tolerance of alcohol is
another.
-- Roy L
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Previous message: The Trucker: "Re: Bill Gates and Tsunamis"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|