Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation....
From: Igor (jjweatherby_at_houston.rr.com)
Date: 01/03/05
- Next message: Igor: "Re: Taxes: Fairness vs. Efficiency"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- In reply to: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:52:32 GMT
royls@telus.net wrote:
>
> Not as long as the landowners also own the media, that is....
>
>
Own the media? Wait a second I thought the Jews owned the media. Or was
it the Liberals? Maybe the Conservatives? Maybe the Christains? Maybe
the Anti-Christ? I do not know all these people keep telling me some one
different ownes the media.
Whacko conspiracy theorist seems claim all of these own the media. Now
that wealthy landowners own a piece too I highly doubt any one group
could have more control. Now you see why I lump you into the conspiracy
theorist category.
>>No politician is going to propose and LVT in addition to current
>>taxes.
>
>
> But they'll propose lots of plain _bad_ taxes, like import duties.
>
That is only because the American public in general has little economic
education. The Congress does not know the cost of the tax and the
workers do not. The unions love stuff like this. Surprisingly enough
people have probably read your post and thought you were a trained
economist. I know much better.
>
>>There is no big conspiracy.
>
>
> Yes, actually, there is, or something near enough to it as makes no
> difference. I have seen it in the faces of politicians, journalists
> and academics I have spoken with about this issue: they know I know,
> but they don't want me to know they know.
>
>
Yes and those Jewish landowners who own the media are surpressing the
truth aren't they?
>>We do not have the European landed
>>aristrocacy here in the US.
>
>
> Check out the Duke of Westminster's holdings in NYC.
>
>
>>Things have changed quite a bit since George.
>
>
> But not the spuriousness of the "arguments" against LVT.
>
>
>>A corporation seeing other taxes drop, such as the portion of
>>social security, they pay as land taxes rose would see the benefits.
>
>
> The productive ones would benefit. But I don't think anyone knows
> just what fraction of any given large corporation's profits represents
> productivity, and what fraction consists of rents.
>
Alas you finally see the problem but you do not see why this is a problem.
- Next message: Igor: "Re: Taxes: Fairness vs. Efficiency"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- In reply to: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Land, Labour and Capital Taxation...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|