TURMEL: Hearst Dynamic Duo in Cochrane Court Friday
From: John Turmel (bc726_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA)
Date: 01/04/05
- Next message: sinister: "Re: Bill Gates and Tsunamis"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: Taxes: Fairness vs. Efficiency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Jan 2005 00:11:55 GMT
JCT: Time to stoke the excitement a bit. It's heady thinking
we could get a stay of the Hitzig resurrection and end all
laying of new charges but let's not forget our other moves.
Pierre Drouin was charged under S.7 with marijuana
cultivation in his home with no evidence other than for
personal use. Real Martin was charged under S.7 with
marijuana cultivation in his home with no evidence other
than for personal use. Two perfect Krieger Quashes.
Actually, better.
Krieger gave evidence he was cultivating it for other than
his own personal use. He admitted he was growing it for
other sick people. And he still beat the cultivation, if not
trafficking, charge.
Here, there is no evidence of other than for personal use,
absolutely better-than-perfect Krieger analogies.
Of course, we're having to play this differently. Here we
have Her Majesty The Clerk who says their applications to
quash must await their trial months away and has refused to
add the quash motions to the docket.
Pierre's going to serving the Notice of Motion to cite his
Crown for contempt in Hearst by tomorrow. But then, instead
of mailing it or rushing it to Cochrane 3 hours away to try
to get it past Her Majesty The Queen for Friday's hearing,
rather than risk a trip and be refused, both the motions,
the one to quash served on November 18 (more
than 30 days) that she refused, and the new one served
tomorrow to cite for contempt that she's not going to get
the chance to refuse, Pierre and Real are going to hand up
both their motions directly to the judge on hearing day,
Just like Doug and Laurie did. Twice.
Many judges don't look at a file until they first sit down
to it. This is not unusual. The moment they call his name,
he hands up the motions with proper service on the back and
demands adjudication. If the judge asks why he didn't have a
few days to read it, Pierre can tell him to ask HMTQ.
And since these motions are as KISS as possible, taking only
minutes for a judge to read, there's nothing lost by the
judge not having had time to pre-read the documentation.
Besides, he's probably going to be reserving his decision on
an issue of this magnitude anyway no matter how the Crown
argues it is not of national importance.
Anyway, Pierre and Real are going to take the unusual step
of filing their motions directly with the judge on the day
of the hearing and avoid HMTQ completely.
Just like Parker was going to do before getting intercepted
with his prize; just like Doug and Laurie Nielsen did twice,
force the judge to deal with a properly served motion.
Walking in with a valid ticket and demanding to ride isn't
easy for the conductor to duck.
It's just too bad that these things often have to start on
such a confrontational note and such high drama and tension.
It's almost like pre-combat, often unnerving for some. Even
I resent having to interrupt the usual course of events
because the track official wouldn't let me in the game.
Remember, this lady's legal opinion that his motion is not
returnable upon 30 days notice to the Crown is wrong. He
shows 30 days service the the Crown and tells the judge he's
seized.
Who wants to bet that if the judge ducks it in Cochrane,
Pierre and Real try to get it in in Elliot Lake. How
embarrassing to the court for fail in their duty to provide
remedy within the requirements of the Act.
No Canadian needs live with a bogus charge ("with a defect
apparent on the face thereof" is the legal jargon) over
their heads for more than 30 days no matter what Her Majesty
The Clerk says.
So the boys are going in on a confrontational angle. The
Crown will know what's happening and frankly, by now, I'd
hope that the judges have all heard about Drouin's and
Martin's Krieger card they hadn't heard of before now.
Come on, wouldn't you think every judge who finds out about
Krieger at the top isn't going to be fascinated how such a
big thing could have been escaped the bench's attention for
two whole years and only be brought out by that loud-mouth
Turmel? A major ruling hidden from them, the gavel-holders
of the system?
"How could we not know?" has to be a question going on in
their minds. "How could this not have made the news?" has to
be the next question. And our applications answer that
question by showing the Crown/Defence cover-up with the
Calgary media. Everything went through 2 reporters and they
didn't tell the true story.
Canada's whole judiciary were fooled into convicting
hundreds of thousands of people. The whole judiciary haven't
yet faced the fact that it's not solely the Crown who has to
be apologizing to the victims but also the judges who didn't
keep abreast of their powers. If they don't cite the Crown
for contempt, can they cite themselves?
How can the judges leave their invalid damaging convictions
on records of so many innocent Canadians? Shouldn't it be
the responsibility of the bench to correct the errors of the
bench? Don't their own records continue to show convictions?
Must the Crown move that the correct their records? Can't
the court initiate the correction of their errors. It's
their signatures on those convictions, not those of the
attorneys.
At least, here, their out is that they can admit they've
been tricked too? Whose responsibility else? But then
they're stuck if they want to continue the prosecution
before them. They're committing the same sin as the Crown
attorneys once they've heard Krieger.
Remember that great line in Ezekiel where God tells him that
if a buddy strays and you don't warn the guy, God'll blame
you. But if you warn the guy, then you're off the hook for
what happens to him. Finding out about Krieger is their
judgment day. "When did you find out about Krieger and why
didn't you obey it?" works on both the Crowns and the
courts. That's why it's going to be so much fun smashing the
Crown with the "Why didn't you obey Krieger?" because the
judges know it applies to them too. Maybe even moreso,
except they were the ones lied to by the lawyers and the
media. They weren't lied to by the other judges. But by the
media. It could be reason for them to get mad.
What if some of the people they had dragged before them were
sickly people growing for their own purposes. Much like most
of the people I've found except for the odd high-profile
case with the guilty-pleaders. What if they felt sorry for
having to confiscate some dying guy's medicine? Can you
understand the lousy things judges have had to do to sick
and dying people for these past two years that they wouldn't
have had to do if they'd known the truth? I think we have a
right to a soon-to-be-irate judiciary. I wouldn't want to be
in Frankel's shoes when the judges start getting angry.
No, I'd think that the Krieger card has already shaken the
back-rooms from coast to coast by now. We're just lucky to
have two perfect cases to attack with. God, what a great
show it's going to be. Wish I could go but it's 7 hours
north of Toronto. Still, it should be a really great show.
Pierre and Real are going to hand up their properly-served
motions, just like Doug and Laurie did, and enter them onto
the docket. And they can tell the Cochrane judge if if won't
hear it, they're going to go to the next court-room and ask
the judge there: in Elliot Lake at the same time as Richard
Johnson on Friday Jan 11 and see if that judge of the North-
Eastern courts has time to deal with his identical motion
too. Har har har har.
The Crown, properly-served, must be ready to respond and the
fact they filed no materials at all so far in Cochrane tells
you their only hope is to stall again. But they can't stall
a response long. Remember that in Elliot Lake, Richard
Johnson has forced a memorandum out of them a few days
before Jan 11, probably Jan 7, Cochrane Day! Har har har.
Richard's filing his Memorandum before tomorrow evening and
then the Crown's on the hook to explain by Friday in their
Memorandum why the Krieger Ace doesn't win against the
Hitzig King (that may soon be stayed too).
Remember, these are perfect Kriegers cases. These guys
already qualify under the MMAR with the right sicknesses,
they just can't get doctors to go against their insurance
companies too often.
But whether their medical need stands up or not comes later.
First, have they been charged under an invalid law? Has
there been a deliberate abuse of the court process? Has
there been contempt of court?
Remember, they're asking that the Crown Attorneys in the
room be cited for contempt (perhaps incompetence) if they
can't read the Supreme Court of Canada Krieger decision
right.
The Nielsens can look at Greg Smith and argue that he's
unfit for his position for being an abuser of the process or
a moron who can't read. How can anyone deny that Supreme
Court of Canada Krieger coming after Ontario Court Hitzig
rules?
We got so pre-occupied with emptying the jails until Krieger
is won that we need reminding of the moves going on to win
Krieger.
It's so much like Parker. Parker got the law declared bad.
Then I had to prove Parker had taken effect and the law was
dead. Krieger won. Now we have to win the proof that it has
taken effect and it's dead. All the while, hundreds of
thousands of innocents are being dragged through the system
even if they'll get off when they prove medical need.
Remember, that's how Justice Doherty said he wanted it to
work. The cops bust everyone with pot and and he'll let
those who prove medical need get off. And they want The
Professor to go back down to the Gilligan level? Is there
anything as disgustingly mind-numbing as advising cops keep
busting everyone because the sick and dying who can prove it
sufficiently to get out? Unless they die first?
It makes me shudder to the core to think that someone who
thinks like this is in a position of influence. The
resurrection judge brought it back to life because judges
like him will dismiss the charges against the sick and
dying. "Bust em and I'll free em after checking they're sick
enough with my stethoscope" says the judge.
Nevertheless, the McLachlin, Major, Fish Supreme Court of
Canada Krieger decision is higher and came after the
Simmons, Goudge, Doherty Court of Appeal for Ontario Hitzig
decision. Plus Hitzig's still being appealed. Plus a stay of
Hitzig is being sought. Krieger is completely won.
If Parker and Krieger had the constitutional right to
cultivate their pot, Pierre Drouin, Real Martin, Richard
Johnson have it too. The only issue is whether it's just
that everyone must suffer the Doherty Dictate that cops bust
everyone and the sick get off or whether cops can't bust the
sick, and therefore, anyone else any more? The Doherty
Dictate condemns the sick and dying to eternal persecution
with an out if they survive the ordeal in jail and court.
Again, by tomorrow, I start pushing to have the request for
a stay of execution of the Hitzig resurrection sent to a
judge of the Supreme Court of Canada. Wouldn't it be nice if
they had live motions day like the old days.
Who knows what's next if this Her Majesty The Clerk decides
the Supreme Court of Canada Act does not apply to Turmel. If
I get flak from the bureaucracy at getting to a judge I'm
allowed to have under the Act, I may have to get a protest
sign and travel to Ottawa to picket the court since there's
no live courts for me to raise my motion in.
But independent from all that, let's not forget the shots
that count. The shots that can have the law accepted as
invalid. The upcoming Quash and Prohibition Motions.
Isn't it incredible that these motions are so easy launch,
20 or so pages or so. But some pretty good shots coming up
at the Crown. And we can expect the Crown's written
memorandum from Richard Johnson by Friday. I can't wait to
finally hear how Krieger doesn't apply.
Of course, I'm expecting the Crown's written response to my
"motion" to stay execution of Hitzig by tomorrow. Wonder
what they're going to do?
If they don't file, they know I'm pushing to have it sent up
without their response. If they do file, how can the
Registrar not sent it up? There has to be collusion in the
back-rooms or the Crown is in a real predicament. How can
they know what to do?
Imagine they don't file. And for some reason, most likely
that judges can change the Supreme Court rules but not the
Supreme Court Act (Parliament's job again), they find they
can't force me to go below and must send the motion for a
stay along to a judge. How will it look without any Crown
response? Har har har har.
Imagine they do file. Then they know they're cinching that
the motion gets to a judge at the top. What a dilemma for
the Crown. Respond and it's in, don't and you may be left
out. And stalling doesn't even help long when they have to
come up with the same answer in Elliot Lake 3 days later.
Har har har har.
Playing a lot of cards at the same time sure does make for
fun combinations of blows.
But here it comes:
Tuesday Jan 04: Deadline Crown response to SCC stay
Thursday Jan 06: Crown's Elliot Lake Memorandum due
Friday Jan 07: Dynamic Duo in Cochrane
Tuesday Jan 11: Johnson family in Elliot Lake
Friday Jan 14: Nielsen family in Brantford (they always but
the kids with the parents to coerce a guilty plea)
And Turmel at any time, in any court, in between.
What a couple of weeks of combat coming up.
What a week for the Crown. Wouldn't you love to be a fly on
their wall? Not to worry, someday, one of the participants
in those meetings will write a book about their biggest
losses.
Anyone disagree that staying out of lower court where it can
get stalled by a reserved decision is a good idea and
hanging in all the way's at the top is best move?
-- Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6 to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics
- Next message: sinister: "Re: Bill Gates and Tsunamis"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: Taxes: Fairness vs. Efficiency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
