Re: Income from a tax on land.
From: XCobraJock (JackneySneeb_at_nogov4me.net)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Nielsens attack on Contempt and Krieger too"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- In reply to: esenter: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: esenter: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:44:14 -0800
esenter wrote:
>> Only if you think 100 million dead is insignificant. In any case, I
>> don't accept the premise that might makes right. That's all there is
>> to it.
>>
> In that case, I suppose you would not mind if I "borrow" your car for
> awhile and not return it. The premise is 'might makes right' - not
> 'might is right'. Only omnipotence is right.
Maybe this exchange where ed explains his philosophy
will help people understand ed as I have come to
understand him:
> 2b) You and I enter into an agreement to rob Dan Evans of his
> wallet. I renege. Do you have the right to enforce that agreement?
> Yes__ No__
"Yes" --ed senter, Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 14:39:03 -0600
--XCobraJock
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Nielsens attack on Contempt and Krieger too"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- In reply to: esenter: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: esenter: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]