Re: Death By ***

From: paul (paul_eitchison_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/16/05 

Date: 16 Jan 2005 02:37:35 -0800

JaZ wrote:
> Amanda's Sisters
> 2005-01-15
>
> The power structure today has goals and purposes that endanger girls
> like Amanda Maynard; multiracialism must be abandoned if White
> children are to have the future of hope and progress they deserve.
>
> by Kevin Alfred Strom
>
> Amanda Maynard and Kenneth O'Neal, the "nice, quiet Black boy" who
> lived across the street from Amanda and who was the agent of her fate
> on New Year's Eve. Bottom, a bouquet left at Amanda's home. On
today's
> program, Mr. Strom examines the roots of the profound sickness that
> has disarmed White America in the face of aliens and enemies -- and
> put young people like Miss Maynard at terrible risk.
>
> JUST A FEW DAYS AGO, on New Year's Eve, as 2004 turned into 2005,
> Amanda Raechel Maynard, a White high school freshman described by her
> friends as a "sweet, good girl" was at her home alone in Garner,
North
> Carolina. There was a party up the road, but she didn't go to it.
> Amanda still slept with one of her childhood toys, a stuffed animal
> she called "Super Piggy." Known to her friends by her nickname Rae
> Rae, Amanda was considered kindhearted. She "loved everybody," her
> mother said. Friends said she was "as pretty as she was kind." She
was
> just 15 years old.
>
> Amanda lived on a pleasant wooded cul-de-sac in a neighborhood of
nice
> and well-kept homes. Across the street lived some nice Black people,
> the O'Neals. No discrimination allowed, you know, even in the South.
> The O'Neals had the financial wherewithal to move into the nice
> development in the forest-like setting, and so there they were. Among
> them was 19-year-old Kenneth O'Neal. To be fair, it must be said that
> Kenneth O'Neal wasn't like many young Black males. He had no criminal
> record. He was quiet. He didn't bother people. He wasn't into the
thug
> lifestyle. He was even part of a largely-White clique of young people
> in the area. They welcomed him into what they call the 'Goth' scene:
> they wear Black, are fascinated with vampires and all the trappings
of
> 19th-century horror novels. They listen to some pretty sick music,
> like members of other subcultures do too these days, but these
'Goths'
> generally don't hurt people. Kenneth O'Neal kept to himself most of
> the time. Neighbors said that he often liked to take walks in the
> neighborhood, sometimes late at night, all alone. He bothered no one.
> But, walking around like that, he was able to notice the comings and
> goings of all his neighbors. There are only ten or so houses on the
> dead-end street. So he was aware that Amanda, whom he knew casually,
> was home alone that night. So that nice, quiet teenaged Black male
> went over to see Amanda Raechel Maynard on New Year's Eve. He brought
> a knife along.
>
> We don't know what Amanda said when Kenneth O'Neal showed up. But we
> do know that she won't be wishing her parents or her neighbors Happy
> New Year ever again. Because when Kenneth O'Neal left Amanda, she was
> dead. O'Neal had murdered her. Shortly after arriving, he has now
> admitted in a confession obtained by police, he approached her, and
> when she screamed he chased her down and stabbed her repeatedly in
the
> head until she was dead. He then sexually violated her dead body.
>
> When he was well-satisfied with his work, O'Neal walked over to the
> party down the street, went to the bathroom there and washed up,
> removing the blood and other stains, and then drank, told jokes, and
> even played the piano with his broadminded neighbors. Later, in the
> wee hours of the morning, he sauntered back to his home and, he says,
> told his mother he "had heard screams" coming from across the street.
> His mother called 911 and, strangely, told the police that she had
> also heard the screams right before calling -- while her son was at
> home -- though evidence, including O'Neal's own confession, indicated
> the murder had been committed long before.
>
> Some people, including some members of Amanda's family, are making
> much of the Goth connection in this murder, saying that Kenneth
O'Neal
> had supposedly listened to some pretty disgusting Goth music with
> violent lyrics before he killed Amanda. And the young Goths -- mostly
> Whites -- have reacted strongly, denying any violent proclivities for
> their group, which, they say, is mainly about fashion and music. I'd
> add that it's also about attitude, and the nihilistic attitude is in
> my view an unhealthy though understandable reaction to an unhealthy
> society and an unfulfilling life. But "Goth" White youth are not
> terrorizing our cities and spreading a violent crime wave into our
> suburbs. These White kids are not genetically different from their
> more conventional peers, and there's no evidence I've seen to
indicate
> they're more criminal. They certainly don't constitute a major threat
> to our people.
>
> http://www.ci.garner.nc.us/police/news/news_item.asp?NewsID=294
> http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/news/010505_NW_onealinvesitgation.html
> http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/news/010405_NW_garnermurder.html
> http://tinyurl.com/5hf6u
>
> We don't have a Goth problem; we have a Black problem. It's gotten
> even beyond a Black problem: We have a Third World savages problem.
> We're not allowed to discuss the savages as savages. We're not
allowed
> to admit that there are biological differences between the races that
> make them behave differently even in the same environment, that make
> some of them very volatile and violent no matter what subculture they
> belong to or adopt. We're not allowed to say that we'd be better off
> in a White society with White standards of behavior, ethics, and
> justice. We're not supposed to even start thinking that we could do
> not only just as well, but infinitely better in every way, without
the
> violence and stupidity and crime of the Third Worlders that is hung
> around our necks. We're not supposed to say that not only are the
non-
> White savages a direct threat to us and our children, but that even
> the non-Whites who aren't savages are a biological threat who are
> supplanting us, replacing us, and killing us through racial mixing in
> the lands our forefathers fought and died for. We're not supposed to
> say that these people do not share our standards, our ethics, or our
> love of freedom and that we will surely lose our freedom and make our
> civilization into a Third World hellhole if we give up and let them
> take the land that ought to belong to our sons and daughters. Not
only
> are we not allowed to say such things, but we damned sure are not
> supposed to do anything about them.
>
> But I must add that the Blacks are not at the root of the Black
> problem. Primitive Third World peoples generally are not themselves
at
> the root of the disintegration of America. If they were restricted to
> their own territories, where they could live as they see fit and
where
> their leadership elements could handle their social problems in a way
> appropriate to their nature -- or not handle them, for that matter --
> they would not be a problem for us. Sudan, Mexico, and the
Philippines
> will never constitute a technological or economic or military threat
> to the First World, the White World. The problem is the mindset and
> the laws and the pressure that make us import and support and mix
with
> these people to the point that it literally is killing us as a
society
> and a race just as it killed Amanda Maynard as an individual.
>
> The real threat -- the real root of the Black problem and the
> immigration problem and the severe problem of the needless tragic
> death of Amanda Maynard and the thousands of White men, women, boys
> and girls like her -- is the highly organized and well-funded
> establishment which has made multiracialism into a new religion, into
> a false morality and an all-too-real legal system which forces us to
> accept the Kenneth O'Neals of this world into our neighborhoods, into
> our places of work, and into the schools where we send our innocent
> children. And this multiracialist establishment -- in media, in
> government, in the academy -- is largely a Jewish establishment.
>
> Let me give you an example. In the United States, the Jewish
> organization calling itself the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai
B'rith
> (or ADL for short) is in the forefront of the quasi-legal and
> propaganda campaigns to convince White people that it is good and
> virtuous to mix the races, both in society and in the marriage bed.
> The ADL, which has links to Jewish organized crime, has engaged in
> corruption of police departments, even stealing police files to get
> "intelligence" on Americans who don't approve of the ADL's
> multiracialist agenda. The ADL pushes for laws -- and even writes
> "model statutes" that are passed by craven legislatures plied by
> Jewish money and cowed by Jewish media -- which would criminalize
> Whites speaking out on behalf of our race. The ADL even pushes its
> filth on schoolchildren and gets our tax money to pay for it.
>
> But does the ADL "sincerely believe" in multiracialism and
> intermarriage as a philosophy for everyone? Hell, no, they don't.
They
> believe in multiracialism and intermarriage only for non-Jews, for
you
> and me and Amanda Maynard. For themselves, for Jews, they preach an
> entirely different philosophy -- an opposite philosophy, in fact. A
> philosophy of preserving their identity as a people. A philosophy of
> nationalism and of maintaining the blood of their nation pure. A
> philosophy that opposes intermarriage and works against it. A
> philosophy that seeks to inculcate a fierce loyalty to nation and
race
> in its children, a loyalty that will last a lifetime.
>
> For the ADL's attitudes regarding Jewish separatism see
>
> http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4456
>
>
> Abraham Foxman and the other leaders and higher-level functionaries
of
> the Jewish establishment know that multiracialism is a poison that
> leads to societal death. They go to great lengths to avoid
> multiracialism and mixing for their own people. But for other
peoples,
> they promote -- nay, even insist upon -- the very same poison. We,
> they say, must never exclude the Kenneth O'Neals of this world from
> our neighborhoods, from our businesses, from our schools. To do so,
> they say, is the ultimate sin. But that is exactly what we must do.
> Even more important, we must exclude the Abraham Foxmans of this
world
> from any position of power over us.
A fine article.

Paul

http://www.natall.com/

Quantcast