Re: Income from a tax on land.
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 01/16/05
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- In reply to: Courageous: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: Courageous: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Reply: Courageous: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:58:48 GMT
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:55:11 GMT, Courageous <dontwant@spam.com>
wrote:
>>>You might more realistically expect to see medical immortality
>>>before thinking machines.
>
>>That is a statement that is pretty much guaranteed to be wrong.
>
>Why do you say?
?? I already did: "Hint: how long would it take, at a _minimum_, to
see medical immortality?"
-- Roy L
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- In reply to: Courageous: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Next in thread: Courageous: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Reply: Courageous: "Re: Income from a tax on land."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]