Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security"
From: Mason A. Clark (masoncNOT_at_THISix.netcom.comQQQ)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: Mason A. Clark: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Previous message: Les Cargill: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- In reply to: Rob Duncan: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Next in thread: New Dark Ages: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Reply: New Dark Ages: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Reply: Rob Duncan: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Reply: Les Cargill: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:26:18 GMT
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:08:26 -0800, "Rob Duncan" <robduncan@gbronline.com>
wrote:
>
>Obviously written by, and then posted by, two idiots. I guess in the next
>several decades we should expect no advances in medical science that
>decreases costs? Always the problem with the left.
>
>
I'm not quite sure what this is all about, but advances
in medical science have almost always increased the
cost of medical care.
This, by the way, illustrates a serious problem with
inflation measures in general. Science increases
medical cost -- inflation -- but the product is
superior. So is that really inflation?
Mason C
- Next message: Mason A. Clark: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Previous message: Les Cargill: "Re: Question about President's Social Security plan"
- In reply to: Rob Duncan: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Next in thread: New Dark Ages: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Reply: New Dark Ages: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Reply: Rob Duncan: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Reply: Les Cargill: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|