Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 01/19/05
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- In reply to: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Next in thread: The Trucker: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Reply: The Trucker: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:58:09 -0500
royls@telus.net wrote:
>
> As I have pointed out before, that tax was clearly designed for the
> purpose of giving taxes that bear on the rich a bad name.
And all along I thought the luxury tax was to raise money for the gummint.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Samuelson: "It's More Than Social Security""
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- In reply to: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Next in thread: The Trucker: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Reply: The Trucker: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: "Why the Georgist movement has not succeeded:" - by Warren Samuels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|