Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security
From: Socialism is a Mental Disease (root_at_localhost.)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: New Dark Ages: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Previous message: zerge_at_hotmail.com: "Can economic growth initially increase unemployment?"
- In reply to: The Trucker: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Next in thread: The Trucker: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Reply: The Trucker: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:24:37 GMT
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:58:19 -0800, The Trucker <mikcob@verizon.net>
wrote:
>
>>
>> The problem is that it isn't theirs either. Why should it be immoral
>> to exclude others if others have no moral claim to what I am holding?
>> That's why I don't think there is a clear philosophical principle on
>> which to stand for moral guidance here.
>
>It is really very simple: We/they have the same exact moral claim to
>use or consume the resource as you. That is the point here. You
>have no _superior_ moral claim. You seem to _want_ a moral superiortiy
>simply because you have staked a claim on some natural resource.
>
Coburn, why are you burning your two neurons on something that
completely transcends you?
-- "A society that robs an individual of the product of his effort... is... a mob held together by institutionalized gang rule." -- Ayn Rand
- Next message: New Dark Ages: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Previous message: zerge_at_hotmail.com: "Can economic growth initially increase unemployment?"
- In reply to: The Trucker: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Next in thread: The Trucker: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Reply: The Trucker: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]