Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?
From: Igor (jjweatherby_at_houston.rr.com)
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: Igor: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: The monopolization of the air and Georgism"
- In reply to: Bill: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Next in thread: Robert Vienneau: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Reply: Robert Vienneau: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Reply: Bill: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:18:26 GMT
Bill wrote:
> <zerge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1106077002.589121.211450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>>Bill wrote:
>>
>>>"Igor" <jjweatherby@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>news:dS_Gd.26183$Ta2.13935@fe2.texas.rr.com...
>>>
>>>>wilfred wrote:
>>>>
>>>>><zerge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:1105994298.131535.139850@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>r...@telus.net wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 17 Jan 2005 08:21:29 -0800, zerge@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As productivity increases in an industry or in a country,
>>
>>salaries
>>
>>>>>>tend
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>to rise.
>>>>>>>>Can anyone explain the cause-and-effect that leads to this
>>
>>dynamic?
>>
>>>>It is very simple. As productivity rises firms wish to hire more
>>
>>workers.
>>
>>>That may not be true. For example, if you fully automate a factory
>>
>>you may
>>
>>>need less people.
>>>
>>>Bill
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Less people per unit produced, sure. But not necessarily less people in
>>absolute terms. Productivity and number of workers in absolute terms
>>are independent variables.
>>
>
>
> Could be less and could be more. They are not quite independent. If you do
> nothing nothing you need the same number of people per unit of volume. If you
> do a massive automation it is possible that you may be able to increase your
> production to something far beyond what you could sell with far fewer people.
>
They are independent. If prices stay the same and cost of the product
drop, unless there is a capacity constraint firms will produce more
output. This will cause labor demand to shift out. At each wage they
will want to hire more workers than before.
Where the confusion is is that firms will hire more workers if THE WAGE
STAYS CONSTANT. Without an increase in the supply of labor this will not
happen. Wages will likely rise over time but unless there is a change in
supply, firms will hire more workers in the short run. There is just
more profit to be made for a good and the increase in production will
fuel more workers being hired eventhough it takes fewer workers to
produce one unit.
The second part of the confusion is that you are talking about
substituting capital for labor. The analysis is short run so capital
does not get substituted for labor. Productivity can rise for reasons
other than new capital. New process can be implemented, eg. the assembly
line. This cuts cost and makes production faster but no new capital is
involved. Workers may be trained in new techniques. There are other
reasons for productivity gains than new machines.
However, if Wages rise above capital there is a possibility that
substitution can happen. In this case the effect is indeterminate.
- Next message: Igor: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Previous message: Igor: "Re: The monopolization of the air and Georgism"
- In reply to: Bill: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Next in thread: Robert Vienneau: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Reply: Robert Vienneau: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Reply: Bill: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|