Re: Solution to Soc Sec problem
From: tonyp (tonyp_at_world.std.com)
Date: 01/24/05
- Previous message: Mason A. Clark: "Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- In reply to: Mason A. Clark: "Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- Next in thread: Jim Blair: "Re: Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- Reply: Jim Blair: "Re: Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:16:44 -0500
"Mason A. Clark" <masoncNOT@THISix.netcom.comQQQ> wrote
> Have the government invest the SS fund in private stocks
> and bonds, rather than in treasury bonds as it does now.
>
> That is to say, invest in the growth and profits of the
> economy.
The government can _tax_ the "growth and profits of the economy". Instead
of collecting "dividends" to redistribute to retirees, it can collect
_exactly_the_same_amount_ of money as "taxes" and redistribute it to
retirees. As far as "the economy" is concerned, the same amount of money
remains available for investment in either case.
So, if you do expect "growth and profits" in "the economy" you don't have to
put government in the business of picking winners and losers. If you
_don't_ expect "growth and profits" then it doesn't matter whether you call
the government's take as "taxes" or "dividends" -- it will be inadequate
either way.
--Tony P.
- Previous message: Mason A. Clark: "Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- In reply to: Mason A. Clark: "Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- Next in thread: Jim Blair: "Re: Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- Reply: Jim Blair: "Re: Solution to Soc Sec problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|