Re: stupidity considered harmful
From: Robert Vienneau (rvien_at_see.sig.com)
Date: 01/25/05
- Next message: Robert Vienneau: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Previous message: clusterlove_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: stupidity considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: stupidity considered harmful"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: stupidity considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 04:31:04 -0500
In article
<bca91e497100e9f608548e423f622a80.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>, "Kent
Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote:
> "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote:
> When you are told that you are making yourself look
> like a jerk by making claims without providing
> evidence, and your reply is of the form "do you
> deny" rather than in the form of the needed evidence
> to support your claims, you merely confirm the
> previous impression as a near certainty.
To describe Kolker as merely a jerk is to be kind.
Out of curiousity, Kent, why did you decide to start
cross-posting to sci.econ a few months ago?
-- Mostly economics: <http://www.dreamscape.com/rvien/#PublicationsForFun> r c v s a Whether strength of body or of mind, or wisdom, or i m p virtue, are found in proportion to the power or wealth e a e of a man is a question fit perhaps to be discussed by n e . slaves in the hearing of their masters, but highly @ r c m unbecoming to reasonable and free men in search of d o the truth. -- Rousseau
- Next message: Robert Vienneau: "Re: How does productivity turn into higher wages?"
- Previous message: clusterlove_at_hotmail.com: "Re: Wages, Inflation and Social Security"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: stupidity considered harmful"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: stupidity considered harmful"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: stupidity considered harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|