Re: Soc.Sec. We're all with Bush

Big
Date: 02/10/05 

Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:56:33 -0600

On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:46:21 GMT, "sinister" <sinister@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>
><Big Dog> wrote in message

[edited]

>>>Nah, mostly because it would prevent the Rethuglicans from using payroll
>>>taxes as a way to fund general government operations.
>>
>> That was a nonpartisan plan, and is a nonpartisan activity.
>
>No, moron. I'm referring to the Rethuglican plan to use payroll taxes to
>fund general government operations, and then not pay back the money borrowed
>from the trust fund.

And you think this is a activity unique to Republicans?

What a sad day.

Thanks,
Big Dog