Re: Soc.Sec. We're all with Bush

From: sinister (sinister_at_nospam.invalid)
Date: 02/10/05 

Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:37:36 GMT

<Big Dog> wrote in message
news:g8cl01d63tg59ldtbd1jsumc7fbtfuisre@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:46:21 GMT, "sinister" <sinister@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>
>><Big Dog> wrote in message
>
> [edited]
>
>>>>Nah, mostly because it would prevent the Rethuglicans from using payroll
>>>>taxes as a way to fund general government operations.
>>>
>>> That was a nonpartisan plan, and is a nonpartisan activity.
>>
>>No, moron. I'm referring to the Rethuglican plan to use payroll taxes to
>>fund general government operations, and then not pay back the money
>>borrowed
>>from the trust fund.
>
> And you think this is a activity unique to Republicans?
>
> What a sad day.

Why don't you consider the evidence?

How many Republicans say the SS Trust Fund bonds "can't" be honored in the
future? How many Democrats?

>
> Thanks,
> Big Dog
>
>

Relevant Pages