Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?
From: Zerge (zerge_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: Quirk: "Great Eagle, Accept this Prayer for America"
- Previous message: Courageous: "Re: Salon: SS Reform: "Bush's Dirty Little Secret""
- In reply to: ta6bx_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Next in thread: The Trucker: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Reply: The Trucker: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Reply: Jim Blair: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 11 Feb 2005 08:30:01 -0800
ta6bx@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 10 Feb 2005 23:10:37 -0800, "Zerge" <zerge@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >ta6bx@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> Supposedly when SS was started there were many people working and
few
> >> people collecting, say 15 working to 1 collecting. (Don't know
the
> >> actuall numbers).
> >>
> >> Now there are maybe 3.5 working to 1 collecting and in the future
> >> there will be 2 working to 1 collecting.
> >>
> >> Obviously this is a problem for SS. But, how do private
investment
> >> accounts solve the problem? If there are 2 people working for
each
> >> retired person, these 2 have to produce enough goods and services
for
> >> 3. It doen's matter how the retired (unproductive) person gets
money
> >> to purchase their share of the national product. If the retired
one
> >> taxes the productive two, those two have less to spend on goods
and
> >> services and the retired one gets to spend what has been taxed.
> >>
> >> Now, If instead of taxing, the retired person has a big investment
> >> account you have three people spending money to aquire the product
> >> produced by two. The working two still get "taxed" in a way
because
> >> they cannot purchase all of their product.
> >>
> >> In the extreme say every one was 25 years old and every one saved.
> >> When they all retired on the same day, they would have enormous
> >> accounts. They would also all starve as no one was producing any
> >food
> >> .
> >> It seems that the actual problem is the ratio of non-productive to
> >> productive, not how the non-productive finance their
> >> non-productiveness.
> >
> >You have a very sketchy understanding of economy, I'm sorry to say.
> >The "retired one" does not "tax the productive two". The retired one
> >saved a % of his/her earnings and invested it in stocks and bonds.
This
> >investment grew. Now he/she has a good amount of money to keep
spending
> >without having to work. That amount of money will demand goods and
> >services from the economy. Entrepreneurs will build new companies to
> >serve that demand. The GDP of a country is not a limited asset to be
> >"taxed", as you suggest.
> >
> Who produces the GDP of the country if most of that country is
> retired. People do not eat stocks and bonds. Someone has to produce
> food.
You are talking about a hypothetical scenario that will not ocurr:
namely, where EVERYBODY is retired. The population pyramid will never
be like that.
And you forget foreign countries that export goods to the US.
Don't worry, there will always be young, hungry, and ambitious people
willing to produce goods and services for those retired.
- Next message: Quirk: "Great Eagle, Accept this Prayer for America"
- Previous message: Courageous: "Re: Salon: SS Reform: "Bush's Dirty Little Secret""
- In reply to: ta6bx_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Next in thread: The Trucker: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Reply: The Trucker: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Reply: Jim Blair: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|