Re: S. Petersburg paradox
From: Sunny (sunnyelloco_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: the most hated man"
- Previous message: König Prüß, GfbAEV: "Re: Winston Churchill: Land Price as a Cause of Poverty"
- In reply to: Forwarded: "Re: S. Petersburg paradox"
- Next in thread: beda pietanza: "Re: S. Petersburg paradox"
- Reply: beda pietanza: "Re: S. Petersburg paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Feb 2005 06:14:00 -0800
> > Since the Expectation value of the game is infinite, what is the
> > even bet a bettor should be willing to pay in order to play the
> > game?????
Here's something off the top of my head:
The probability of winning 2^n units is (1/2)^n, so on average you
need to play 1/((1/2)^n) = 2^n times to win 2^n units. However to play
that many times, you pay x*2^n units in entrance fees, where x is the
entrance fee for one throw.. So for every amount you win from a draw,
you expect to have lost x*2^n units. So to come out on top, you'd pay
x<1 units to enter.
There's probably some silly mistake there, but I'm sure someone will
point it out soon enough.
-Sunny
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: the most hated man"
- Previous message: König Prüß, GfbAEV: "Re: Winston Churchill: Land Price as a Cause of Poverty"
- In reply to: Forwarded: "Re: S. Petersburg paradox"
- Next in thread: beda pietanza: "Re: S. Petersburg paradox"
- Reply: beda pietanza: "Re: S. Petersburg paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|