Re: Eminent Domain Abuse
From: Arthur A. Fay (afay3_at_houston.rr.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Previous message: sinister: "Re: Why socialized medicine is inevitable"
- In reply to: Dan Clore: "Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: ruetheday_at_outgun.com: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: Michael A. Clem: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:18:05 GMT
Does anyone believe the concept of "Eminent Domain" has any legitimacy at
any time? It's a clear violation of property rights, not to mention
the natural right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness happiness
afforded to all individuals.
Art
On 2/25/05 1:17 AM, in article 3881o8F5kttehU1@individual.net, "Dan Clore"
<clore@columbia-center.org> wrote:
> News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo
>
> *****
>
> Libertarian speaker decries government abuse of eminent domain
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Previous message: sinister: "Re: Why socialized medicine is inevitable"
- In reply to: Dan Clore: "Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: ruetheday_at_outgun.com: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: Michael A. Clem: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]