Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- In reply to: Bill: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Next in thread: Bill: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Reply: Bill: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:10:27 GMT
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:14:19 GMT, "Bill" <xxx@yy.zz> wrote:
>I'm not even sure where this discussion started but I think it was my
>suggestion that people are sometimes introduced to drugs by others in social
>situations and if they were very scarce this would be less likely to happen.
>This still seems true.
But you don't seem to have a handle on the concepts of "cost" and
"benefit." Addictions imply a certain level of cost to society, but
so does enforcement. Spending $1G on enforcement to eliminate $1M in
addiction costs does not make a lot of sense; but at the
zero-tolerance margin, that is what you are proposing, and worse.
Think of it this way: if at any given level of drug importation you
could cut drug imports in half by spending $1G on enforcement, how
much would you have to spend on enforcement to eliminate drug imports
entirely? How much benefit would you get by spending $1G to reduce
total imports from a gram to half a gram?
-- Roy L
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- In reply to: Bill: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Next in thread: Bill: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Reply: Bill: "Re: A Prison State, If Not a Police State"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|