Re: Population problem? Solved!
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: sinister: "Microsoft on the right side of a patent suit"
- Previous message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Krieger v. Clay/Caine/Malmo-Levine at SCC"
- In reply to: glbrad01: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Reply: Les Cargill: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Mar 2005 05:40:26 -0800
glbrad01 wrote:
[Pollyannaish shovelware drivel, in a really
generous helping.]
Unfortunately for your thesis, what nature is most
effective at evolving in an environment consisting
solely of sludge and pollution is single celled
organisms.
If humankind doesn't leave itself a functioning
ecosystem, through population control, and active
oversight, all the evolution nature can provide is
just going to produce more and better varieties of
cyanobacteria and if lucky, nematodes.
Great Apes with sloppy habits need not apply.
Already it is very marginal whether our energy
supplies will last long enough to get even one
off-planet colony established before the home world
goes into an energy-starved dystopia.
xanthian.
- Next message: sinister: "Microsoft on the right side of a patent suit"
- Previous message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Krieger v. Clay/Caine/Malmo-Levine at SCC"
- In reply to: glbrad01: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Reply: Les Cargill: "Re: Population problem? Solved!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
