Re: Eminent Domain Abuse
ruetheday_at_outgun.com
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Josh Rosenbluth: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Next in thread: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Mar 2005 18:25:05 -0800
>That's 100% the wrong question.
No, it's precisely the right question.
>I'm not after particular results but particular processes. If we had a
>state monopoly in car building and I proposed a free market, would
>you ask me how I would build a car? What steel I would buy? Where
>I would the facvtories? How much I would pay my employees?
If you agree that some functions of government are necessary, then you
agree they must be funded. The question is - how? I prefer a tax on
unproductive activity to one on productive activity. I prefer one on
something with an inelastic supply so that there is no deadweight loss
due to the tax. I prefer one that taxes an externality to one that
does not. That is why I support LVT.
- Next message: Josh Rosenbluth: "Re: Soc Sec: How do private investment accounts solve the problem?"
- Previous message: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Next in thread: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Reply: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]