Re: Eminent Domain Abuse
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:42:22 GMT
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:18:05 -0800, David Schwartz
<davids@webmaster.com> wrote:
>Mark Monson wrote:
>
>>>"Mark Monson" <m_monson@ztech.com> wrote in message
>>>news:iJoXd.13269$Q83.3296@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>
>>>>Ok. I get it. You're one of those people who think all government is bad,
>>>>all public
>>>>expenditure is bad, and all taxation is theft.
>
>>> It really depends upon precisely how you define those terms. Some
>>>governments are worse than others, some better. I'm perfectly capable of
>>>evaluating proposals on a case-by-case basis. As proposals go, this is one
>>>of the worst, enshrining precisely the evils it claims to combat.
>
>> What would you tax and why?
>
> That's 100% the wrong question.
Right. Because you have 100% no answer.
>I'm not after particular results but
>particular processes.
Absurd. That's like claiming you don't care if you eat french fried
potatoes or french friend horse manure, as long as it's french fried.
>If we had a state monopoly in car building and I
>proposed a free market, would you ask me how I would build a car? What
>steel I would buy? Where I would the facvtories? How much I would pay my
>employees?
No. But I might ask you how you proposed such decisions be made.
-- Roy L
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- In reply to: David Schwartz: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Next in thread: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|