Re: Eminent Domain Abuse

From: David Schwartz (davids_at_webmaster.com)
Date: 03/12/05 

Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:56:32 -0800

<royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:4230dc0f.24544377@news.telus.net...
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:05:03 -0800, "David Schwartz"

> Yes, of course he does. He _paid_ the guys who _created_ the car
> _for_creating_it_. The landowner only paid a previous owner, who did
> no more, and contributed no more, than any other previous owner, none
> of whom contributed _anything_, as the land was _already_there_, with
> no help from them.
>
> You are destroyed.
>
> David, you started out claiming that our arguments had been refuted
> many times in this forum, and that no one could make them honestly.
>
> But what has in fact happened?

    I will just cite this and refer anyone intellectually honest to refer to
the many posts where I thoroughly refuted this drivel.

    DS

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Advice to a Mother Expecting a Third Boy by Mona Charen
    ... I don't recall taking you to ... taking me to task for off-topic posts either. ... Ben called out, "I'm sorry, David is ... David's face hit my hand. ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: Proper language (was Re: Fat is a feminist issue)
    ... While David's bluntness and direct use of language does sometimes ... knowing if what Marilee says is true", ... large number of David's posts, *and I do not recall a single occasion* when ... including David, are relatively constant and likely to influence the ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: He looked beyond my fault and showed me mercy
    ... David posts is right, but in the same instance ALL of you post as you ... we all 'misbehave' on usenet. ... crossposted groups but does not ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: He looked beyond my fault and showed me mercy
    ... David posts is right, but in the same instance ALL of you post as you ... crossposted groups but does not ... And thus, whilst I myself choose not to be rude to David, if he wants to post to Usenet then he's a legal adult and is responsible for his behaviour. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: [OT} Meteorites (was Re: David: unplonked.)
    ... There are also two posters in SRQ that just post their posts about their own obsession, and fail to be particularly interested in any sort of response or reasonable discussion. ... Whilst David shows many of the above characteristics, I don't think he posts his obsessional posts to interrupt the group, and clearly he is quite interested in responses and discussion. ... I am not at all interested in anything to do with his pet subjectbut I do value his other input. ... As to the other two people who are in my killfile from this group, occasionally I toodle over to Google Groups to see whether I should remove them from my killfile - and so far I have seen to reason to do so. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)