Re: Questions about Community Currency.
From: polar bear (bear_at_pole.com)
Date: 03/12/05
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: What's wrong with Republicans?"
- In reply to: William F Hummel: "Re: Questions about Community Currency."
- Next in thread: William F Hummel: "Re: Questions about Community Currency."
- Reply: William F Hummel: "Re: Questions about Community Currency."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:28:59 -0800
In article <59l331lkr1rdcf3sn3o375dcb77k8em44a@4ax.com>, William F
Hummel <wfhummel@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:52:09 -0800, polar bear <bear@pole.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <ubv031dh0v04njderv9ntqmk1afv016co5@4ax.com>, William F
> >Hummel <wfhummel@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >>The expansion of the money supply is mainly
> >> the result of bank credit expansion, driven by the demand for credit
> >> rather than by government initiative.
> >
> >You should probably read this:
> >http://www.safehaven.com/article-187.htm
> >
> >about halfway down the page, paragraph starting with:
> >
> >"I think we all suffer from trying to analyze the highly complex
> >contemporary financial world through concepts that were developed back
> >when the banking system was basically the credit system, and bank
> >deposit expansion was the key component of money supply growth."
> >
> An interesting article, and I fully agree with the observation that
> the credit system has expanded far beyond the banking system. However
> money supply growth is still largely a function of bank lending. The
> main exception is the money market mutual funds which now serve as a
> money proxy. There is some confusion about the meaning of the term
> "money supply." The usual meaning is that which we use in purchasing,
> paying bills, or investing, in other words liquid financial assets
> (LFAs). That should be contrasted with non-liquid financial assets
> (NLFAs) such as credit issued by non-bank financial institutions.
>
> The amount of credit far exceeds the money supply. In fact
> bank-issued credit, which comprises the main part of the money supply,
> now accounts for less than 20% of the total credit market debt. NLFAs
> normally expand and contract without affecting the money supply. For
> example, investor A lends $1M to finance company B, who then lends it
> to business C. The result is that $1M in A's bank account has
> transferred to C's bank account. The money supply remains the same,
> but the total credit market debt has increased by $2M.
>
> The author of the article presents an obsolete version of how the
> money supply expands through bank lending, the so-called money
> multiplier concept. He starts with an injection of reserves into the
> banking system by central bank, whereupon the banking system issues
> credit money equal to a multiple of those reserves, depending on the
> required reserve ratio. This version has not applied for many
> decades. Central banks now target the interest rate on money market
> funds, and respond to the demand for reserves as required by the
> banking system. In Canada and several other countries, where banks
> hold little or no reserves since there is no reserve requirement, the
> money multiplier concept obviously has no meaning.
As far as I'm aware, open market operations are the tool of choice with
this Fed. Who they trade with makes little difference however, since
the bulk of money created ends up in inflating financial assets, which
are then leveraged to buy more inflating assets - same as happened in
Japan, and it will end just as badly. Doug's main point stands. The
Fed may target money supply, but that's not where the action is.
They know it, and they also know there's nothing they can do about it,
short of collapsing the system. All they can do is jawbone, and try to
push it out past Greenspan's retirement. After that, all bets are off.
pb
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Eminent Domain Abuse"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: What's wrong with Republicans?"
- In reply to: William F Hummel: "Re: Questions about Community Currency."
- Next in thread: William F Hummel: "Re: Questions about Community Currency."
- Reply: William F Hummel: "Re: Questions about Community Currency."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|