Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- From: "ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx" <ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Mar 2005 16:40:35 -0800
>Law of the strong over the weak. When it is done in the right form,
>it is not a jungle at all.
How can it be anything but?
>Nay, nay. If it is true for thee it is equally true for me. I just do
>not have much hope and I have very low expectations. In that way I am
>never disappointed and sometimes I am even pleasently surprised.
>Being a pessimits is optimal. Being an optimist is pessimal.
>Optimists are very often disappointed.
>Two things are true (at least).
>1. In the long run we will all be dead, so very little matters.
>2. *** happens.
So you're a nihilist? That explains a lot.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- From: robert j. kolker
- Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- References:
- Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- From: robert j. kolker
- Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- Prev by Date: Re: Whither the Georgies or wither the Georgies
- Next by Date: Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- Previous by thread: Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- Next by thread: Re: How many of you would support a poll tax in place of our current income tax?
- Index(es):