Re: Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- From: "sinister" <sinister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:32:19 GMT
"Ron Peterson" <ron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114442076.924978.210500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> sinister wrote:
>> There's a lot of political momentum in my locality (MD suburbs of
> Wash DC)
>> for cutting property tax rates. Today's _Washington Post_ metro
> section has
>> an article, "Outcry Rises as Levy on Montgomery Property Also
> Increases."
>> First 'graphs (URL
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12353-2005Apr23.html)
> follow.
>> Any suggestions for a short list of counterpoints?
>
> Population density might be the problem causing greater expenses for
> government services. See:
> http://www.npg.org/forum_series/optimal_city_size.htm
No, in this case (Montgomery County, Maryland, part of greater DC metro
area) it's because of the housing bubble.
Whether all the money is well spent is a separate issue.
> --
> Ron
>
.
- References:
- Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- From: sinister
- Re: Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- From: Ron Peterson
- Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- Prev by Date: Re: Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- Next by Date: Re: Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- Previous by thread: Re: Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- Next by thread: Re: Best response to landowner tax complaints?
- Index(es):