Re: Property rights nutjobs
- From: "sinister" <sinister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:33:06 GMT
"Mark Monson" <m_monson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7O6be.112$lf2.11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1114308287.905146.56070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >These rights are violated any time an individual is deprived of
>> >his property without compensation -- when it is stolen, for
>> >example, but also when it is subjected to governmental
>> >regulation that reduces its value
>>
>> I wonder if this nitwit believes in the inverse - that when there is a
>> positive externality that cause the value of the property in question
>> to increase that the property owner must compensate those who caused it
>> to come about. Somehow I'm guessing that the answer is no.
>>
> http://www.alternet.org/story/21791/
>
> Givings: The Flip Side of Takings
>
> By David Morris, AlterNet. Posted April 19, 2005.
[snip]
That's a very informative article.
.
- References:
- Property rights nutjobs
- From: sinister
- Re: Property rights nutjobs
- From: ruetheday@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Property rights nutjobs
- From: Mark Monson
- Property rights nutjobs
- Prev by Date: Moral Minimum Income - a point of view
- Next by Date: Re: Santorum introduces more rent collection opps
- Previous by thread: Re: Property rights nutjobs
- Next by thread: US Economic Bust Began in March 2000
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|