Re: LVT: more arguments against

In sci.econ, Mark Monson <mmonson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If this argument was valid then simply proving you paid for stolen
> property would give you the right to keep it. But of course it doesn't.

In certain instances, our laws give a buyer better title than his seller
had. How does that fit in with your paradigm?

--
Words are flying out like endless rain into a paper cup.
They slither while they pass. They slip away across the universe.

--John Lennon
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast